WRIT PETITION NO. 2973 OF 2025
1 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "Limitation Act, 1908"
1912 result(s) found
Found 1912 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Commercial Appeal in Partnership Dispute — Rejects Rejection of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Court holds that a plaint cannot be rejected on the ground of non-joinder of necessary parties or lack of cause of action when the plaintiff seeks declaration of partnership rights and accounts.
25 Sep 2025The case involves a commercial appeal filed by Mrs. Bhagyashree Jain against M/s. Vyshnavi Visions and its partners, challenging the trial court's ord...
- 86
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Commercial Division, Adjudicates Arbitration Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act — Challenge to Arbitral Award in Indian Premier League Franchise Dispute. Award Directed Payment of Damages and Interest to Franchisee; Petition Alleges Patent Illegality and Excess of Jurisdiction by Arbitrator.
16 Jun 2021The dispute arose from the termination of a franchise agreement between the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), the governing body for crick...
- 15
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Revenue Sharing Dispute. Court upholds award granting 7% revenue share and costs, finding no patent illegality or perversity in arbitrator's interpretation of contract clauses.
11 Jun 2012The petitioner, Taj Air Ltd. (formerly Megapode Airlines Ltd.), filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeki...
- 199
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint in Specific Performance Suit Despite Commencement of Trial — Amendment Sought to Add Legal Submissions and Subsequent Event Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC. Court Holds That Amendments Based on Existing Facts and Subsequent Events Are Permissible Even After Trial Has Commenced, Subject to Due Diligence.
5 Mar 2012The plaintiffs filed a Chamber Summons seeking amendment of the plaint in a suit for specific performance of an agreement, declaration that terminatio...
- 163
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Railways Act Case Regarding Sufficiency of Notice Under Section 77. The Court ruled that the requirement of notice under Section 77 of the Indian Railways Act, 1890, should be liberally construed and notice addressed to the Chief Commercial Manager (Claims and Refunds) was valid compliance.
7 Mar 1968The dispute arose from a contract for carriage of goods by rail. The appellant, a consignor, booked goods for transportation from Sealdah station via ...
- 87
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Appointment of Arbitrator in Partnership Dispute Due to Lack of Written Arbitration Agreement. Section 11 Application Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Fails as Alleged Partnership Deed of 1975 Not Produced and No Arbitration Clause Established.
19 Sep 2013The applicant, Yashvant Chunilal Mody, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of a s...
- 173
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Fraud Case — Upholds Rights of Purchaser Under Unregistered Sale Deed Against Subsequent Purchaser. Vendor's Double Sale and Fraudulent Conveyance Set Aside; Court Holds That Registration Relates Back to Date of Execution and Minor's Contract Is Voidable, Not Void, Under Specific Circumstances.
19 Jul 2024The case involves a property dispute where the appellants (plaintiffs) purchased suit land from respondent no.2 (vendor) via a sale deed executed on 0...
- 640
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Considers Two Regular First Appeals from Decrees Granting Declaration and Injunction Over Inam Lands; Question of Civil Court's Jurisdiction Over Re-grant Matters Under Karnataka Certain Inams Abolition Act, 1977 Is Raised.
11 Sep 2025These two regular first appeals arose from decrees passed by the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ballari, sitting at Siruguppa, in O.S.No.263/2012 a...
- 27
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Striking of Election Petition Paragraphs in Municipal Election Dispute. Court upholds that vague allegations of corrupt practices without specific details of consent by the returned candidate are liable to be struck off under Order VI Rule 16 CPC.
2 Aug 2011The petitioner, Eknath Bayaji Gadkari, filed an election petition under Section 33(1) of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, challenging the e...
- 90
