Search Results for "1964 Rules"

1695 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1695 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition to Quash FIR Against Intermediary in Alleged Fraud. Petitioner Alleged to be Mere Intermediary Between Complainant Company and UK-Based Supplier in International Sales Contract.

The petitioner, Govindaraja, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Crimin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Jurisdiction of Civil Court in Possession Dispute Involving Family Members. Section 33 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Held Not to Bar Suit as Tenancy Question Not Directly Arising.

The appeal before the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court arose from an order of a learned Single Judge deciding a preliminary issue of jurisdicti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Tax Authorities in Madras Urban Land Tax Act — Act Held Constitutionally Valid. Levy of 0.4% on Market Value of Urban Land Under Madras Urban Land Tax Act, 1966 Not Violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(f), and Retrospective Operation Reasonable.

The case concerned the constitutional validity of the Madras Urban Land Tax Act, 1966, which levied a tax on urban land at 0.4% of its market value. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Disposes of Two Public Interest Litigations Challenging Joint Venture Agreement for Transfer of 20 Acres of Land at Film City, Goregaon. The Court Decided the Common Challenge to the Agreement in Both Petitions, Leaving Other Reliefs for Separate Adjudication.

The High Court of Bombay heard two public interest litigations filed by different sets of petitioners, both challenging the actions of the Maharashtra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Sarpanch Election Due to Non-Compliance with Secret Ballot Requirement. Election of Sarpanch set aside for violation of Rule 8(2) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats (Sarpanch and Deputy Sarpanch) Election Rules, 1964, which mandates secret ballot.

The petitioner, Vaishali Chaburao Katore, a member of Grampanchayat Nimgaon Khalu, challenged the election of respondent no.4, Shankar Ramdas Shinde, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application for Adverse Inference and Denial of Cross-Examination in Commercial Suit. Trial Court's Discretion Upheld as No Perversity or Arbitrariness Shown Under Article 227 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Sivagami N., was the first defendant in a commercial suit (Com.OS 64/2022) pending before the LXXXV Additional City Civil and Sessions...