Search Results for "widow defendant"

664 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 664 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit, Upholds Preliminary Decree Granting 1/3rd Share to Plaintiffs. Court holds that plaintiffs established their claim over ancestral property and that the suit was not barred by limitation.

The appeal arises from a preliminary decree passed in O.S.No.32/2015 by the Senior Civil Judge, Sirsi, decreeing the suit for partition. The plaintiff...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Partition Appeal in Co-owner Dispute — Rejects Adverse Possession Claim. Court holds that a co-owner cannot claim adverse possession against another co-owner without ouster, and a suit for partition is not barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a family dispute over property originally owned by M.A. Mohammed Ayoob. The appellant, Mohammed Hussain, filed a suit for partition ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit, Restores Trial Court's Decree for Money Recovery Instead of Specific Performance. The High Court erred in granting specific performance as the transaction was found to be a loan with collateral security under the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal by the subsequent purchasers (appellants) against the High Court's decree granting specific performance of an agr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Reopening of Partition Permitted Due to Non-Inclusion of Joint Family Property. The Court held that a prior partition decree not binding on the plaintiff as she was not a party and the property was joint family property.

The appellant, Monakka Shinde, filed a suit (O.S. 370/2004) for reopening of partition, declaration, and injunction against her sons, Maruti Shinde an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Remand Order in Licence Fee Dispute — Trial Court Must Decide Suit on Merits Without Being Influenced by Observations in Remand Order. Appellate Court Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Order XLI Rules 23, 23-A, 25 CPC by Remanding Without Deciding Appeal on Merits.

The appellant (original plaintiff) filed Regular Civil Suit No.1900/2012 (Old Special Civil Suit No.535/2008) for mandatory injunction and recovery of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Return of Plaint in Trespass Suit — Jurisdiction Must Be Decided on Plaint Averments, Not Evidence. The court held that under Order 7 Rule 10 CPC, a plaint can be returned only if the plaint itself shows lack of jurisdiction, not after a trial on evidence.

The appellant, Globe Theatres Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit in the Bombay City Civil Court for recovery of possession, injunction, and damages against the r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Restores Trial Court's Decree of Declaration of Ownership and Injunction. First Appellate Court's Reversal Set Aside for Improper Appreciation of Evidence Under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendants (appellants) against the judgment and decree of the first appellate court, which re...