Search Results for "unsatisfactory explanation"

312 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 312 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Favor of Plaintiff in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit. Registered Trademark 'SACU-V' for Heart Failure Drug Protected Against Deceptively Similar Mark 'SACV' for Same Composition Pharmaceutical Product.

The Plaintiff, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd., is engaged in manufacturing and sale of pharmaceutical preparations. It adopted the trademark 'SACU-V' i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging CAT Order Rejecting Condonation of Delay in Disciplinary Matter. Delay of 8 Years in Filing Original Application Not Sufficiently Explained, No Sufficient Cause Shown.

The petitioner, Anil Ramdas Pawar, a retired BSNL employee, was working as an Assistant General Manager in the Telecom Department, Amravati. He was no...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions of Lecturers Challenging Termination by Unaided Private Engineering College. Termination of Probationers for Unsatisfactory Performance Does Not Amount to Retrenchment Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and Is Not an Unfair Labour Practice Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by lecturers (Sudhakar Shivaram Teke, Prof. S. S. Rayamane, and Udaykumar Govindrao Gurlhosur) agains...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Case for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Subjective Satisfaction. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Grounds Were Stale and Irrelevant, Violating Article 22(5) of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, brother-in-law of the detenu Ganesh Narayan Mane, challenged the detention order dated 08.09.2017 passed by the Commissioner of Police...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses University's Appeal Against Chancellor's Power to Appoint Inquiry Committee. Chancellor's power under Section 11(1) & (2) of Visvesvaraya Technological University Act, 1994 includes authority to appoint fact-finding committee to inquire into irregularities.

The Visvesvaraya Technological University, Belagavi, filed a writ appeal against an order of a learned Single Judge dated 27.02.2015 dismissing its wr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Convicts Police Head Constable for Criminal Contempt for Misconduct in Executing Conviction Warrants. Wilful Disobedience of Court Orders and Misuse of Official Seal Constitute Contempt of Court Under Section 2(c) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The present contempt proceedings arise out of a reference dated 18/20th April 2013 made by the District Judge-3, Ambajogai to the Bombay High Court. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by School Management Challenging Reinstatement of Clerk in MEPS Act Case. Temporary Appointment in Permanent Vacancy Treated as Probationary, Termination Without Inquiry Held Illegal.

The case involves a writ petition filed by the Head Master and President of a school management challenging the judgment and order of the School Tribu...