WRIT PETITION NO. 2320 OF 2018
4 Feb 2019The matter arises from a writ petition filed by Mandhana Industries Ltd, a public limited company engaged in textile manufacturing, against an order o...
Search Results for "truthfulness verification"
136 result(s) found
Found 136 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Defamation Case Against Chairman and Managing Director of Indian Express for Lack of Vicarious Liability in News Publication. The court held that under Section 7 of the Press and Registration of Books Act, 1867, only the Editor or Resident Editor whose name is printed is presumed responsible for publication, and the Chairman and Managing Director cannot be held liable without specific allegations.
5 Aug 2016The applicant, Mr. Vivek Goenka, the Chairman and Managing Director of Indian Express Newspapers (Mumbai) Ltd., filed an application under Section 482...
- 276
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPD Act for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Public Order Disturbance. Detenu's Preventive Detention as Dangerous Person Set Aside as In-Camera Statements Were Not Properly Considered and Bail/Notice Under Section 41-A CrPC Were Ignored.
21 Apr 2023The petitioner, Atahar Khan Amir Khan, a detenu, challenged the detention order dated 29.08.2022 passed by the Collector and District Magistrate, Akol...
- 107
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Defamation Proceedings Against Newspaper Chairman and Editor-in-Chief for Lack of Specific Allegations. Process under Section 500 IPC set aside as complaint failed to show applicants' direct involvement in selection or publication of defamatory news item.
20 Jun 2022The applicants, Vijay Darda (Chairman of Lokmat Media Private Limited) and Rajendra Darda (Editor-in-Chief of Lokmat Media), filed a criminal applicat...
- 63
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Compensation for Wrongful Preventive Detention Under Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 — Detention Order Invalid for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction Regarding Public Order. The court held that the absence of subjective satisfaction in the detention order rendered it invalid, entitling the petitioner to compensation for the period of detention.
13 Oct 2014The petitioner, Yuvraj Ramchandra Pawar, was detained under an order dated 2nd December 2013 passed by the District Magistrate, Satara, under Section ...
- 73
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes MPDA Detention Order for Non-Communication of Documents — Violation of Section 8 MPDA Act. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detenu Was Not Supplied Copies of In-Camera Statements and Bail Order, Depriving Him of Right to Make Effective Representation.
28 Jan 2019The petitioner, Omkar Chandrashekhar Kapare, challenged his preventive detention under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords...
- 101
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Accused Husband and Family in 498A and Dowry Harassment Case Due to Vague Allegations and Habitual Complainant. Held that Mere Stray Utterance Like Calling 'Prostitute' Does Not Constitute Cruelty Under Section 498A IPC, Relying on Kahkashan Kausar v. State of Bihar; Continued Proceedings Would Be Abuse of Process Under Section 482 CrPC.
3 Sep 2024The case arose from a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, filed by the husband (accused No. 1), mother-in-law, father-...
- 31
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Three Writ Petitions Challenging Caste Scrutiny Committee Orders — Sets Aside Invalidations of Scheduled Tribe Certificates for Non-Consideration of Contemporaneous Documents. Court Directs Re-Verification with Proper Hearing and Liberal Approach Under Maharashtra Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, De-notified Tribes (Vimukta Jatis), Nomadic Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Special Backward Category (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Caste Certificate Act, 2000.
30 Oct 2015The judgment disposes of three writ petitions challenging orders of the Caste Scrutiny Committees that invalidated the Scheduled Tribe claims of the p...
- 171
High Court
Bombay High Court hears writ petition challenging blacklisting order of consultant by MCGM for alleged collusion in road works. Dispute concerns alleged denial of natural justice in blacklisting process under Article 226 of Constitution of India.
12 Jun 2018The dispute arose from a request for qualification issued by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) on 23 October 2013, inviting consultan...
- 49
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Stale Grounds. Single FIR and Bail Not Sufficient to Treat Detenu as Dangerous Person Affecting Public Order.
4 Dec 2021The petitioner, Vishal Aananda Mahabal, was detained under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootlegger...
- 62
