Search Results for "trade test"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "trade test"

1423 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1423 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — No Deceptive Similarity Between STIMULIV and STIMULET for Different Pharmaceutical Products. The court held that the mark 'STIMULET' used for an allopathic breast cancer drug does not infringe the registered mark 'STIMULIV' used for Ayurvedic liver medicines due to differences in nature, trade channels, and customers under Section 29(2) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

20 Jan 2023

The case involves a trademark infringement and passing off dispute between two pharmaceutical companies. The appellant, Corona Remedies Private Limite...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Includability of Bought-Out Items in Assessable Value of CKD Boilers. Appeal Under Section 35L(1)(b) of Central Excise Act, 1944 Challenges CESTAT Order Holding That Essential Parts Delivered at Site Must Be Included in Transaction Value for Duty Assessment.

1 Jan 1970

The Supreme Court heard statutory appeals under Section 35L(1)(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the common final order of the Customs, Excis...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Favor of Plaintiff in Trademark Infringement Suit Over STIMULIV vs STIMULET. Marks Held Deceptively Similar Despite Differences in Pharmaceutical Formulation and Therapeutic Use.

1 Mar 2021

The dispute involves two pharmaceutical companies: Franco Indian Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd (Plaintiff) and Corona Remedies Pvt Ltd (Defendant). The Plai...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trade Name Dispute Over 'Bhagat Tarachand' — Plaintiff Establishes Prima Facie Case of Proprietorship and Likelihood of Confusion. The court restrained defendants from using the trade name 'Bhagat Tarachand' or any deceptively similar name in their restaurant business at Inorbit Mall, Vashi, pending suit.

25 Aug 2010

The plaintiff, Vanita Dilip Chawla, filed a suit seeking a declaration that she is the registered proprietor of the trade name 'Bhagat Tarachand' and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Trade Union Recognition and Election in Air India. Court upholds the validity of the recognition granted to Air India Employees Union and the election conducted under the Code of Discipline in Industry, 1958.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by Air India Employees Guild and Air Corporation Employees Union challenging the recognition granted...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Interim Injunction Application in Trademark Infringement Suit Concerning 'REGAL' Footwear Mark. Registered Proprietor Seeks Injunction Against Identical Mark Used by Defendant for Footwear Retail, Raising Prior Use and Acquiescence Defences.

2 Jan 2023

The dispute arose in the Commercial Division of the Bombay High Court in a suit for trademark infringement and passing off concerning the mark 'REGAL'...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Import of Peas Under Restricted Category Based on Pre-Notification Contracts. Petitioners' goods cleared as contracts entered prior to amendment notification dated 29.03.2019 under Section 3 of Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992.

15 Oct 2020

The petitioners, M/s. Harihar Collections and M/s. Raj Grow Impex LLP, are engaged in the import and export of agricultural commodities. They imported...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Tender Award in Electricity Meter Procurement — No Arbitrariness Found in Evaluation Process. Court upholds MSEDCL's decision to award contract to lower bidder after technical evaluation and retesting, rejecting allegations of bias and procedural violations.

14 Oct 2015

The petitioner, Larsen & Toubro Limited, challenged the award of a tender by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. (MSEDCL) for the supp...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Telecom Companies' Appeals, Upholding Tax Deduction at Source Under Section 194H on Discounts to Distributors. Relationship Between Telecom Companies and Distributors Held to Be Principal-Agent, Making Discounts Liable as Commission for Tax Deduction Purposes.

14 Aug 2014

Multiple telecom companies, including Bharti Airtel Limited, Vodafone Essar South Limited, and Tata Teleservices Limited, filed appeals under Section ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Trademark Infringement Suit for ANTITHYROX and THYROX Against Defendant's LETHYROX. No deceptive similarity found as prefix 'LE' distinguishes marks and THYROX is descriptive of thyroid treatment.

29 May 2013

The Plaintiff, Macleods Pharmaceuticals Limited, filed a suit against Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and another for infringement of their registered trad...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)