Search Results for "time barred"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "time barred"

5358 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5358 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal; Upholds Finding that Suit for Specific Performance Is Barred by Limitation. Court Rules Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963 and Article 54 of Limitation Act, 1963.

18 Jul 2018

The case arose from an agreement dated 6.10.1997 between the appellant, Rajesh Dayaldas Narwani, and the respondent, Kanayalal D. Bablani, whereby the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging MMRDA’s Demand for Additional Premium under Lease Deed — Interpretation of Time Extension Clauses and Effect of Interim Court Orders on Construction Deadlines

8 Apr 2026

The Petitioner No.1, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, successfully bid for a plot in Bandra-Kurla Complex leased by the Mumbai Me...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Appeals by Bank in Securitisation Act Case Regarding Maintainability of Civil Suits — The Court Examines Whether Plaints Against Bank Are Barred Under Section 34 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.

26 Oct 2018

The litigation arose from a batch of five civil suits filed by several plaintiffs against M/s. Orbit Corporation Ltd. and Axis Bank Limited, concernin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Application for Rejection of Plaint Based on Unregistered Lease and Determination of Lease. Court Examines Whether Plaint Discloses Cause of Action for Specific Performance and Monetary Claims Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

4 Mar 2014

The case involved a suit for specific performance and a money decree filed by Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd (plaintiff) against the...

High Court

Madras High Court Adjudicated a Commercial Suit for Recovery of Chit Maturity Amount Against a Partnership Firm and Partners. The plaintiff claimed the maturity value based on an acknowledgment of liability and promissory estoppel, while the defendants raised a prior suit for injunction and accounts.

21 Jan 2025

The plaintiff, a construction company, filed a commercial suit against a partnership firm (first defendant) and its partners (defendants 2 to 6) for r...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Assessment Order for Violation of Section 144C(11) Time Limit — DRP Directions Issued Beyond Nine-Month Period Invalid. The court held that the Dispute Resolution Panel's directions under Section 144C(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 must be issued within nine months from the end of the month in which the draft assessment order is received, and failure renders the assessment order void.

14 Feb 2022

The petitioner, Shell India Markets Private Limited, a company engaged in retailing petroleum products and supplying lubricants, challenged an assessm...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Wakf Property Dispute Due to Res Judicata Bar from Prior Representative Suit and Compromise Decree. The Court Held That a Judgment in a Representative Suit Under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Binds All Interested Parties Under Explanation IV to Section 11, and a Compromise Decree Precludes Re-agitation of Title Issues, Affirming Lower Court Decisions.

23 Sep 2021

The dispute centered on a property claimed as wakf by the Jamia Masjid Gubbi, represented by its President, against defendants including successors of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Limitation Dispute Between Contractor and Municipal Corporation. Court holds that cause of action for arbitration arose on rejection of claim by Commissioner on 6th January 2000, not on earlier dates, and thus reference was within limitation.

10 Mar 2023

The case involves two appeals filed by M/s. R.N. Ghanekar & Co. (Appellant) and the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (Respondent) against a com...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit, Reverses First Appellate Court's Dismissal on Limitation and Order II Rule 2 CPC. Time was not of essence of contract and suit was not barred by limitation or res judicata.

20 Aug 2022

The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed Special Civil Suit No. 51 of 1989 for specific performance of an agreement to sell immovable property again...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Appeal Against Remand Order in Suit for Possession, Where Defendant Sought to Introduce Counter-claim for Specific Performance. Appellate Court's Decision to Allow Amendment and Remand Challenged on Grounds of Limitation and Delay.

19 Dec 2006

The litigation originated from an agreement to sell agricultural land bearing Field Survey No. 161 of Mouza Wanoja-Devi, executed on 9 February 1975 b...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)