Search Results for "temporary retention"

88 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 88 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Tribunal Order on Pay Protection for Regularized Employees. Pay Fixation Directed Afresh with Protection of Last Pay Drawn, but Seniority and Other Benefits Denied.

The petitioners, Anil D. Kagathara and another, were initially engaged as casual labourers with the respondent department and were later regularized. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition for Pay Protection in Regularization Case — Tribunal's Order Modified to Protect Last Pay Drawn. Pay Fixation Must Consider Last Pay Drawn Before Regularization Under Service Law Principles.

The petitioners, originally engaged as casual labourers in the Department of Posts, were regularized in service. They filed Original Application No.11...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Interim Application for Appointment of Court Receiver in Property Dispute Over Extra FSI Entitlement. Dispute concerns interpretation of Deed of Conveyance dated 27.09.1994 regarding additional area rights.

The Plaintiff, Erle Benedict Pereira, filed a suit seeking a declaration for extra FSI/additional area in respect of his entitlement under a registere...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Gratuity Award to Compulsorily Retired Employee. Forfeiture of Gratuity Under Section 4(6) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Requires Willful Offence or Moral Turpitude, Not Mere Misconduct.

The petitioner, Bank of Maharashtra, challenged the orders of the Controlling Authority and Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 197...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Gratuity Payment to Retired Employee. Forfeiture of Gratuity under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 requires proof of financial loss caused by employee's misconduct, not merely disciplinary punishment of compulsory retirement.

The petitioner, Bank of Maharashtra, challenged the orders of the Controlling Authority and Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 197...