Search Results for "temporary employee termination"

622 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 622 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by School Management Challenging Reinstatement of Teacher. Termination of a teacher during probation without prior approval under Section 5 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 and without inquiry is illegal.

The petitioner, Pen Shikshan Mahila Samiti, a school management, challenged the judgment and order dated 9.7.1990 passed by the School Tribunal, Pune,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Probationer Employee. Termination of a probationer based on unsatisfactory work without stigma does not require a show cause notice or inquiry under Section 59 of the Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994.

The petitioner, Sanjeev L. Tatuskar, was appointed as a probationer on 09/07/1996 for two years at Pune Institute of Computer Technology. His services...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petition Challenging Reinstatement of Employee in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Oral Termination by Management Set Aside as Unfair Labour Practice Under Item 1 of Schedule IV of MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Suraj Pressings Pvt. Limited, challenged the judgment of the Labour Court dated 04/01/2014, which allowed Complaint (ULP) No.50/2006 f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Watchman in Municipal School Board Termination Case — Backwages Reduced Due to Lack of Evidence of Unemployment. Termination Letter Dated 2.3.1992 Set Aside as Unfair Labour Practice Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The case involves a dispute between the Municipal School Board, Pune (petitioners) and Mohan E. Jagtap (respondent), a watchman. The respondent filed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Compensation Over Reinstatement for Daily Wage Employee in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Refusal of reinstatement and back wages upheld as employee worked only for 4 years and compensation of Rs. 25,000 deemed adequate under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Jagdish s/o Karuji Bombarde, was a daily wage employee of the Municipal Council, Tumsar. He was appointed in February 1997, transferre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Teacher's Petition Challenging Termination - Continuous Temporary Appointments on Consolidated Salary Do Not Confer Permanent Status Under MEPS Act, 1977.

The petitioner, Shrikrushna Nilkanth Joshi, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher by Kopargaon Education Society on 18/06/1982 for one academic year o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petition Challenging Reinstatement of Probationer Teacher. Rule 16(2) of MEPS Rules Mandates Notice Before Concluding Voluntary Abandonment of Employment.

The petitioner, Magasvargiya Shikshan Sanstha, a school management, challenged the judgment and order dated 24.9.2015 of the School Tribunal, Aurangab...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petition Challenging Reinstatement Order for Orally Terminated Employee. Oral Termination Without Departmental Inquiry Held Illegal Under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977.

The petitioner, Uddeshwar Shikshan Prasarak Sanstha and its Head Master, challenged the judgment and order of the School Tribunal dated 26/08/1999 in ...