Search Results for "suo motu inquiry"

279 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 279 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Senior Advocate for Criminal Contempt in Gujarat High Court Case. Scandalous Allegations Against Judiciary and Registry Constitute Criminal Contempt Under Section 2(c)(i) of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal against the conviction of appellant, President of the Gujarat High Court Advocates' Association and a desig...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State's Appeal for Condonation of 837-Day Delay Due to Lack of Plausible Explanation — Administrative Apathy Not Sufficient Ground for Condonation Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The State of Gujarat and another (the applicants) filed a Civil Application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seeking condonation of 837 da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Strikes Down Caste-Based Discrimination in Prison Manuals as Unconstitutional. Prison Rules Dividing Labour and Segregating Barracks by Caste Violate Articles 14, 15, 17, 21, and 23 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Sukanya Shantha, a journalist, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking directions for the repeal of offendi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Enhancement of Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Procedural Violation — High Court's Suo Motu Enhancement Without Notice Held Illegal. Enhancement of Sentence from 7 to 10 Years in Accused's Own Appeal Violates Section 386 Proviso CrPC and Principles of Natural Justice.

The appellant, Kumar Ghimirey, was convicted by the Special Judge (POCSO Act, 2012) under Section 9/10 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Partition Suit Due to Disputed Consent Terms. Consent Decree Set Aside as Court Failed to Verify Genuineness of Compromise Under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.

The appeal arises from a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 28 September 2012, which made absolute a motion for recordi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Tenancy Dispute Due to Delayed Suo-Motu Inquiry Under Section 84-C of Bombay Tenancy & Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. Three-Year Delay in Initiating Inquiry Held Unreasonable, Forfeiture Order Quashed.

The petitioner, Appa Dadu Patil, through his power of attorney holder, challenged the orders passed by the Tenancy Avval Karkoon, the Sub-Divisional O...