Search Results for "stolen property"

468 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 468 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Railway Stores (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1955 Case Due to Lack of Proof that Seized Articles Were Used or Intended for Railway Use. Conviction Under Section 3 Quashed as Prosecution Failed to Establish Goods Were 'Railway Stores' Under Section 2 of the Act.

Background: This criminal appeal arose from proceedings under the Railway Stores (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1955. The appellant, a private individual,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dacoity Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 395 IPC set aside as identification parade was not conducted and recovery of stolen articles was not linked to accused.

The case pertains to two criminal appeals filed by accused persons convicted under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for dacoity. The p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows State’s Acquittal Appeal in Central Warehouse Zinc Ash Theft, Convicts Watchman for Theft. Acquittal Under Section 409 IPC Upheld but Possession of Stolen Property Without Explanation Leads to Conviction Under Section 379 IPC.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the judgment dated 11 March 1995 of the Metropolitan Magistrate, 12th Court, Bandra, Bombay, acquitti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Dacoity Case Due to Lack of Identification and Recovery. Conviction under Sections 395, 397, 457 IPC Set Aside as Test Identification Parade Was Not Conducted and Evidence of Witnesses Was Inconsistent.

The case arises from a dacoity incident that occurred on the night of 20-21 March 1999 at a petrol pump in Dalimb village, Osmanabad. The owner Birajd...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Three Accused in Dacoity with Murder Case — Life Imprisonment Confirmed for Dacoity Under Section 396 IPC. Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Recovery of Stolen Property Under Section 412 IPC.

The case involves four criminal appeals filed under Section 374 of the Criminal Procedure Code against a common judgment and order of conviction and s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Four Accused in Cab Driver Murder Case. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen Theory and Recovery of Stolen Property Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Sections 302 and 120-B IPC.

The case involves four appellants convicted for the murder of a cab driver during a robbery. The prosecution's case was based on circumstantial eviden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Dacoity Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Unproven Recovery. Acquittal of Accused Under Sections 395, 394, 397 IPC Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 07/06/1996 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, in Sessions...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Appeals Against Conviction for Dacoity and Impersonation. Identification of Accused Through Test Identification Parades and Recoveries of Stolen Property Scrutinized Under Sections 395, 397, 170, 342 IPC.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard five criminal appeals filed by seven appellants against their conviction and sentence imposed by the Addi...