Search Results for "share control"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "share control"

1517 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1517 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Petition Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Family MoU Binding on Shareholders. The court held that a family Memorandum of Understanding containing an arbitration clause constitutes a valid arbitration agreement, enforceable under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and binding on heirs and successors.

6 Apr 2021

The appeal arose from the dismissal of a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed before the High Court of Delhi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Application for Appointment of Receiver in Partition Suit. Notice of Motion Seeks Interim Relief for Joint Family Properties Allegedly Misappropriated by Co-Owners.

27 Aug 2013

The plaintiff filed a suit for declaration that he is entitled to a 1/10th share in the assets and properties of the joint family and for partition by...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal in RERA Refund Dispute — Joint Developer Not Liable for Refund of Amounts Not Received. The court held that under Sections 12 and 18 of RERA, only a promoter who has received payment can be directed to refund, and joint and several liability cannot be imposed without statutory basis.

26 Feb 2024

The case involves a dispute under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA) regarding the refund of amounts paid by an allottee to...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal from Injunction Order Granting Interim Relief in IPL Franchise Termination Dispute. Division Bench Considers Whether Change in Shareholding Pattern Constituted Irremediable Breach Warranting Termination of Franchise Agreement Under Clauses 10 and 11, and Whether Conditions Imposed by Single Judge Were Sufficient Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

15 Dec 2010

Background: The dispute pertained to the termination of a franchise agreement between the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and KPH Dream C...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Companies Act and SEBI Regulations Jurisdiction Dispute. The court held that rectificatory jurisdiction under Section 59 of the Companies Act, 2013 is summary and not for contested facts, and SEBI has exclusive jurisdiction over violations of its regulations, not the National Company Law Tribunal.

4 Jan 2023

The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal concerning the rectificatory jurisdiction of the National Company Law Tribunal under Section 59 of the Comp...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Appeals Against Company Law Board's Investigation Order Under Section 237(b)(i) of Companies Act, 1956. Appeals challenge the order directing investigation into the affairs of companies allegedly linked to Ketan Parekh in the 2001 stock scam.

31 Mar 2005

The judgment pertains to 14 appeals filed by various companies alleged to be controlled by Ketan Parekh, the central figure in the 2001 stock market s...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Compounding Application in SEBI Act Case, Overturning Lower Court Decisions on Consent Requirement. Court Holds That Section 24A of Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 Does Not Mandate SEBI's Consent for Compounding, and Compounding Can Be Considered at Advanced Trial Stages Based on Factual Assessment.

23 Jul 2021

The dispute arose from a criminal prosecution under Section 24(1) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, against the appellant, a di...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Section 14 SARFAESI Act Order for Police Aid — No Locus Standi for Borrower's Partner After Property Sold to Third Party. The Court held that once the secured asset is sold and possession handed over to the auction purchaser, the borrower or its partner has no right to challenge the Section 14 order, and the remedy lies before the DRT under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act.

9 Oct 2015

The petitioners, M/s. National Laminate Corporation (a partnership firm) and its partner Mr. Jayantilal L. Nisar, filed a writ petition under Article ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Trade Union's Petition Against Disinvestment of Government Shareholding in Public Sector Undertaking. Disinvestment Policy Upheld as Within Executive Domain, and Previous Litigation Barred Re-agitation Under Res Judicata in Public Interest Litigation Under Article 32 of Constitution.

18 Nov 2021

The National Confederation of Officers Association of Central Public Sector Enterprises, a trade union registered under the Trade Unions Act 1926, alo...

High Court

Madras High Court Partially Allows Partition Appeal, Upholds 1/2 Share for Plaintiff but Sets Aside Mesne Profits Award. Co-owner in possession not liable for mesne profits without proof of ouster.

9 Jun 2026

The appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 28.02.2018 in O.S.No.65 of 2009 on the file of the Fast Track Mahila Court, Dindigul. The plaintiff...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)