Search Results for "setting aside exparte decree"

203 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 203 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Executability of Civil Court Decree in Light of Purchase Certificates Issued Under Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act. Decree for Joint Possession Challenged by Judgment-Debtors Claiming Ownership Under Section 32M of the Tenancy Act, Rendering Decree Inexecutable.

The Bombay High Court entertained a writ petition arising from the order dated 28.7.1986 of the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Islampur, rejecting an a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Appeals From Order, Restores Dismissal of Civil Suits as Barred by Res Judicata. The Court Holds That Ex-Parte Decree in Earlier Suit Over Same Land Operates as Res Judicata Under Section 11 CPC Against Plaintiffs Who Were Parties to Former Suit.

The appeals arose from a common judgment of the District Judge, Udgir, which had allowed the plaintiffs’ appeals against the dismissal of their suit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Confirms Half Share to Plaintiff. Sale Deed Executed by Father Without Legal Necessity Held Not Binding on Daughter as Coparcener Under Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the defendants (appellants) against the judgment and decree in R.A. No. 207/1997, which confirmed the trial...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Petition Challenging Family Court Orders in Divorce Case. Husband's Absence Justified Orders of No Written Statement and Interim Maintenance.

The petitioner husband filed a writ petition challenging two orders of the Family Court, Mumbai dated 5th January 2010 and 5th April 2010 in a divorce...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Execution Court Order Dismissing Application to Set Aside Auction Sale for Non-Compliance with Order XXI Rule 84 CPC. Failure to Deposit 25% of Purchase Money on the Same Day as Sale Renders Auction Void.

The appellants, who were judgment debtors in execution proceedings, filed an application under Order XXI Rule 90 read with Section 151 CPC to set asid...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Suit — Remand Order Set Aside Due to Lack of Jurisdiction. First Appellate Court Exceeded Its Powers Under Order 41 Rule 23 CPC by Remanding Suit Without Satisfying Conditions for Remand.

The appellants, as plaintiffs, filed a suit for declaration of ownership, possession, and permanent injunction in respect of suit schedule property. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Strike Off Defence in Foreign Award Enforcement Proceedings. Security Deposit Condition Not a Bar to Defend Petition on Merits Under Order 39 Rule 11 CPC and Section 49 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioners, Pacific Basin Handymax (UK) Ltd., filed a Notice of Motion under Order 39 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking to st...