Search Results for "seized gold"

461 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 461 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Considers Criminal Appeal Against Conviction Under Sections 395, 397 IPC. The Court Examines the Identification of Accused in a Dacoity Case Where No Test Identification Parade Was Conducted.

Background: This criminal appeal arose from a judgment of the IIIrd Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Parbhani, in Sessions Case No. 63 of 2004, convic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Release of Seized Vehicle Under Section 451 Cr.P.C. in NDPS Case — Petitioner Entitled to Interim Custody of Scorpio Car. Vehicle Not Required for Evidence, Continued Detention Causes Hardship; Release Ordered on Conditions Including Bank Guarantee and Undertaking.

The petitioner, J.R. Ravikumar, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. challenging the orders dated 31.05.2019 passed by the III Addl. Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 of Income-tax Act for A.Y. 2012-13 Based on Search Action — Held That Section 153C Overrides Section 147 for Search-Related Assessments

The Bombay High Court disposed of a batch of writ petitions challenging notices issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 454 Cr.P.C. for Return of Seized Property to Acquitted Accused. Court holds that acquitted persons are entitled to return of seized property unless required for any other proceedings.

The present appeal was filed under Section 454(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the order dated 21.01.2010 passed by the Fast T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Prosecution Against Accused in Customs Act Case for Non-Compliance with Section 138(b) of Customs Act, 1962 — Delay in Filing Complaint Not Explained. Complaint Filed Beyond One-Year Limitation Period Without Any Extension or Explanation, Hence Liable to Be Quashed.

The petitioner, Imtiaz Ahmed, was arraigned as Accused No.2 in CC No.210/2014 pending before the Principal Sessions Judge (Special Judge), Dakshina Ka...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Challenge to FIR Against Income Tax Officials: Sections 138 and 293 Income Tax Act Protection Argued. Court Examines Whether Notice Under Section 91 Cr.P.C. Can Override Statutory Safeguards in Search and Seizure Cases.

The writ petition was filed by income tax authorities under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Robbery Case Due to Inconsistent Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Identification of accused by sole witness in darkness and failure to recover stolen property leads to benefit of doubt.

The case pertains to a robbery incident that occurred on September 7, 2001, at about 8:45 p.m. near Palghar railway station. The complainant, Ritesh R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Murder and Robbery Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt as Prosecution Witnesses Turned Hostile and Recovery of Stolen Property Not Proved.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 24th April 1998 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Thane in Sessi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under Sections 302 and 397 IPC. Accused Challenges Life Imprisonment for Murder and Robbery of Mother-in-Law.

The present criminal appeal arose from the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 24.05.2017 passed by the Principal Sessions Judge, Udupi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Five Accused for Dacoity Under Section 395 IPC. Identification by Witnesses and Recovery of Stolen Articles Held Sufficient to Sustain Conviction.

The case pertains to a dacoity that occurred on 12 May 2003 at the office of Jasmine Cooperative Credit Society in Kalyan. The appellants, along with ...