Search Results for "section 32-G"

92 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 92 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision in Tenancy Dispute, Restores Orders of Agricultural Land Tribunal and SDO. Landlord-Tenant Relationship Established Under Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 — MRT Exceeded Jurisdiction by Reappreciating Evidence.

The petitioners, legal representatives of the original landholder Damodar, challenged a judgment of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (MRT) dated 16 Ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Recovery of Time-Barred Debts under the Haryana Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1979: Resolving Legal Ambiguities and Clarifying Recovery Mechanisms Navigating the Intersection of Statutes of Limitation and Debt Recovery in India

Recovery of Time-Barred Debts under the Haryana Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1979: Appeals arising from judgments of the High Court of Punja...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Heirs' Petition in Tenancy Dispute Due to Delay and Laches. False Statement Regarding Knowledge of Proceedings Leads to Dismissal Under Article 227 of Constitution of India.

The petition was filed by the heirs and legal representatives of the deceased original tenant, Baban Vishnu Shivale, under Article 227 of the Constitu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Writ Petition Challenging Tenant's Purchase of Land Under Section 32G of Bombay Tenancy Act. The Court Upheld the Revenue Tribunal's Order Confirming the Tenant's Purchase, Finding No Error of Law or Fact.

The case involves a dispute between the petitioners (original applicants/landlords) and the respondents (original non-applicants/tenants) concerning a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Land Acquisition Case — Compensation Enhanced Due to Inadequate Market Value Assessment. Court Held That Reference Court Erred in Not Considering Comparable Sale Instances and Potential Value of Land for Development Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case pertains to a writ petition filed by the legal representatives of the original claimant, Sahadeo Mahadik, challenging the judgment and award ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Tenancy Rights in Third Round of Litigation. Respondent's Adoption by Widow Before Tillers Day Confers Tenancy Rights Under Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The case involves a long-standing dispute over tenancy rights in two agricultural lands (Survey No.37/4 and 38/6) in Village Kharshi, Satara District....