Search Results for "section 163"

1342 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1342 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Strikes Down Caste-Based Discrimination in Prison Manuals as Unconstitutional. Prison Rules Dividing Labour and Segregating Barracks by Caste Violate Articles 14, 15, 17, 21, and 23 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Sukanya Shantha, a journalist, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking directions for the repeal of offendi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Applies Multiplier of 18 Instead of 13. Amendment from Section 163A to Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act Allowed to Ensure Just Compensation.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by Smt. Omana Chetan, widow of deceased S.R. Chetan, who died in a road accident involving a lorry. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Recovery Orders Imposed on Retired Junior Engineer Without Inquiry. Recovery of Rs. 86,52,163 and Withholding of Pension Without Departmental Inquiry Held Violative of Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, a retired Junior Engineer of Hubli Electricity Supply Company Limited (HESCOM), challenged orders dated 29-07-2021 and 16-10-2017 impo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Dog on Road Constitutes 'Act of God' Not Negligence. Claimant's Wife Died After Motorcycle Fell Due to Sudden Appearance of Dog; Tribunal Erred in Holding Claimant as Owner of Borrowed Vehicle Under Section 163A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Shri Vithal, filed a claim petition under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation for the death of his wife ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Grants Leave to Appeal Against High Court Order Upholding CLB's Condonation of Delay in Share Transmission Registration. Core Issue Revolves Around Interpretation of Section 58(3) of Companies Act, 2013 and the CLB's Inherent Powers to Apply Limitation Act Provisions.

The dispute centered on the condonation of a 249-day delay in filing an appeal under Section 58(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 before the Company Law B...