Search Results for "returning officer acceptance"

263 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 263 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration. Demand for Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order of the Special Court (ACB), Nagpur, dated 6th April 2009, which acquitted the respond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Election Process of Cooperative Society for Lack of Jurisdiction. Alternative remedy under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 held to be efficacious, barring writ jurisdiction under Article 226.

The petitioner, Pramod s/o Pandurang Patil, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Auranga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Transgender Woman to Contest Grampanchayat Election from Women-General Reserved Ward. Right to Self-Perceived Gender Identity Under Section 4(2) of Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019 and NALSA Judgment Upheld.

The petitioner, Anjali Guru Sanjana Jaan, a transgender person who identifies as female, filed a writ petition challenging the rejection of her nomina...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging APMC Election Nomination for Lack of Locus Standi. Petitioner, Not Being a Candidate or Voter, Cannot Challenge Acceptance of Nomination Under Karnataka APMC Rules.

The petitioner, Sri Ravikumar H.P., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand and Acceptance Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Shashikant Piraji Sonawane, was convicted by the Special Judge for Greater Bombay under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Co...