Search Results for "resettlement act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "resettlement act"

395 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 395 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Civil Court Decree in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Petitioner Failed to Establish Entitlement to Higher Compensation Under Section 28A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court held that the petitioner, having sought reference under Section 18, was not entitled to re-determination under Section 28A, and the issue was barred by res judicata.

20 Aug 2025

The petitioner, the Defense Estate Officer, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and decree dated 30.09.2024 passed by the Senior Civil Judg...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Execution Court Order in Land Acquisition Dispute — Defense Estate Officer Succeeds in Setting Aside Ex-Parte Order Due to Lack of Notice. The Court held that the execution court failed to issue notice to the judgment debtor before proceeding with execution, violating principles of natural justice under Order XXI Rule 22 CPC.

20 Aug 2025

The petitioner, The Defense Estate Officer, Karnataka and Goa Circle, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Monetary Compensation for Land Acquisition for Road Widening, Holds Entitlement Only to TDR/FSI Under MRTP Act. The court held that the acquisition was under the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966, not the 2013 Act, and the petitioner had an alternative remedy by way of civil suit.

20 Feb 2025

The petitioner, Purnima Talkies, a proprietary concern, owned land in Dahanu where a cinema talkies was constructed. The Dahanu Nagar Parishad issued ...

High Court

High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Impleading Orders in Land Acquisition References — Reference Court Exceeded Jurisdiction by Allowing Impleading Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC Without Adjudicating Title. The Court Held That the Land Acquisition Act is a Complete Code and Third Parties Must Establish Title Before a Civil Court.

20 Dec 2024

The High Court of Karnataka at Kalaburagi, presided over by Justice, delivered a common judgment on 20 December 2024 in three connected writ petitions...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Municipal Corporation to Follow 2013 Act for Land Acquisition When Owner Refuses TDR. Land Reserved for Public Purpose Under MRTP Act Cannot Be Acquired by Compelling TDR; Authority Must Initiate Acquisition Under 2013 Act if Owner Refuses TDR.

1 Jan 2024

The petitioner, a Public Charitable Trust, owned land bearing CTS No.216(pt) and CTS No.190 in Village Mandapeshwar, Borivali, Mumbai. The land was re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Lapse and Subsequent Possession Under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 — Held that Once Acquisition Lapses, Possession Cannot Be Retained Without Fresh Proceedings.

9 Dec 2021

The petitioners, owners of agricultural lands in Golatgaon, Aurangabad, challenged the acquisition of their lands under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Interprets Time Limits for Awards Under Land Acquisition Laws in Appeal Against High Court Ruling on Lapse of Proceedings. The Court Examines Whether the Two-Year Period Under Section 11A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Applies Post-Repeal or the Twelve-Month Period Under Section 25 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Governs Awards Under Section 24(1)(a).

10 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Maharashtra for the Gosikhurd Project. On 16th June 2011, a notification...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Lapsation of Land Reservations Under MRTP Act — Failure to Acquire Land Within Ten Years Results in Deemed Lapse. Reservation for Public Offices and Truck Terminal on Petitioner's Land Held Lapsed as No Acquisition Proceedings Were Initiated Within Statutory Period Under Section 127 of MRTP Act, 1966.

11 Aug 2021

The petitioner, Sakharam Mahadev Jadhav, was the owner of lands bearing Survey No.69/1 and 69/2/1 situated at Village Belavali, Taluka Ambarnath, Dist...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Declaration of Lapse of Land Acquisition Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act — Possession Taken and Compensation Paid, No Lapse Occurs. The Court held that where possession has been taken and compensation paid, the acquisition does not lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

8 Mar 2017

The petitioners, owners of 2/3rd share in Survey No.4/12 and other survey numbers at Thergaon, Pune, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Co...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Acquisition Notifications for Lack of Public Purpose and Non-Compliance with KIADB Act. Acquisition for Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board fails as the Board is not an industrial concern under Section 2(7) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966.

15 Dec 2016

The petitioners, owners of agricultural lands in Amani Bellandur Khane Village, Varthur Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, challenged the preliminary notifi...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)