Search Results for "reference jurisdiction"

14456 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 14456 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Appeal Challenging Family Court Jurisdiction in Divorce Petition Filed by Wife in Pune. Wife's Residence in Pune Confers Jurisdiction Under Section 19(iii)(a) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 as She is the Petitioner.

The appellant husband, a US citizen, married the respondent wife on 21st November 2002 in India. The marriage was registered on the same day. The part...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Section 138 NI Act Jurisdiction Dispute — Complaint Maintainable at Place of Payee's Bank. Territorial jurisdiction for dishonour of cheque lies where the payee's bank is located, as presentation and dishonour occur there under Section 178(d) CrPC.

The case involves a criminal appeal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, concerning territorial jurisdiction. The appellant, Cro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction in Arbitration Dispute. Court holds that no part of cause of action arose within its jurisdiction as contract was executed and performed in Chennai, and arbitration venue was Chennai.

The petitioner, M/s. Roman Tarmat Ltd., filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking an injunction restrain...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Sets Aside MSME Facilitation Council Award for Lack of Jurisdiction — BSNL Not Liable for Interest Under MSMED Act as Council Had No Territorial Authority Over Dispute Arising from Contract with Chennai Seat of Arbitration.

The petitioner, M/s. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL), filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeal Against Remission of Arbitral Award for De Novo Consideration Due to Jurisdictional Error. Arbitrator Exceeded Jurisdiction by Entertaining Claims Not Raised Before Chief Engineer and Commissioner Under Contractual Pre-Arbitration Procedure.

The appellant, Biwater Penstocks Ltd., a UK-based company, entered into a contract with the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay (first respondent)...