Search Results for "reference court award"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "reference court award"

5873 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5873 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by State Undertaking in BOT Arbitration Dispute, Upholds Arbitral Award on Termination Payment. Court Reiterates Limited Scope of Judicial Interference Under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Emphasizing Finality of Arbitral Awards.

29 May 2026

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation Ltd. (MPRDC) against the judgment of the Madhya Pradesh Hi...

High Court

ARBITRATION PETITION NO.549 OF 2013

9 Jun 2017

...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Examines Applicability of Section 28A(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 to Modified Awards of Reference Court. The core legal question involved the interpretation of Section 28A(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as inserted by the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984, and its application to awards of the Reference Court that modified the original award of the Special Land Acquisition Officer.

14 Sep 2021

The judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay addressed a batch of writ petitions arising from land acquisition proceedings for the public pu...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Against Dismissal of Section 34 Application as Time-Barred. Limitation for Filing Application Under Section 34(3) Runs from Receipt of Award; Suit Filed Within Extended 30-Day Period Without Showing Sufficient Cause for Delay Cannot be Entertained.

26 Nov 2019

This appeal arose from the dismissal of an arbitration suit filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbit...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Decides on the Validity of Arbitral Award Covering Foreign Immoveable Properties Excluded from Preliminary Decree in a Partition Suit. Construction of Reference to Arbitration under Section 21 of the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 Clarified.

13 Nov 1959

The dispute arose from a partition suit filed by the respondent, Subramaniam Chettiar, against his brother, Nachiappa Chettiar, and his sons (appellan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award Directing Indemnity for Depreciation Disallowance. Petitioners Argue that Clause 14 of Lease Agreement Does Not Cover Income Tax Depreciation Denial and Rely on Identical Clause Interpretation in Prior Judgment.

20 Jan 2015

The dispute arose from a lease agreement executed in 1997 between Borosil Glass Works Limited (lessee/petitioner) and Tata Motors Limited (lessor/resp...

High Court

Bombay High Court Delivers Common Judgment on Cross Appeals Against Order Partly Setting Aside Arbitral Award in BOT Contract Dispute. The Court examines whether the Single Judge correctly assessed claims arising from a Build-Operate-Transfer road project, considering the State's argument on suppressed Office Note and extension of toll collection period.

4 May 2018

These appeals arise out of a common order of a single Judge of the High Court dated 12 February 2015 in three arbitration petitions challenging an arb...

High Court

Full Bench of Bombay High Court Determines Reference on Maintainability of Section 18 Reference Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 After 2013 Act Came into Force. Key Issue Involves Whether Landowners Can Seek Enhancement Under Old Act When Award Passed After Commencement of 2013 Act.

7 Aug 2019

Background: The matter arose from a land acquisition proceeding initiated by the Pune Municipal Corporation under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. A no...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petition in Securities Arbitration Case — Interest Award Not an Error Apparent on Face of Record. Review under Section 114 CPC read with Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC is not an appeal; mere disagreement with the judgment is not a ground for review.

23 Nov 2018

The review petition was filed by Kotak Securities Ltd. seeking review of the judgment dated 22.02.2013 passed by the High Court of Karnataka in RFA No...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Unsuccessful Party in Arbitration Seeking Interim Relief Under Section 9. The Court holds that a party whose claim has been rejected in arbitration has no enforceable award and cannot invoke Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 at the post-award stage to seek interim measures.

24 Apr 2026

The Supreme Court in this batch of appeals addressed the substantial question of law whether a party unsuccessful in arbitral proceedings can maintain...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)