Search Results for "recreational area"

166 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 166 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Constitutional Validity of Rule 13.3.1.5 of Pune Development Control Rules Allowing Municipal Takeover of Private Open Spaces for ₹1 Compensation. Petitioners Claim Violation of Right to Property under Article 300A and Lack of Statutory Basis in BPMC Act.

Five writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the constitutional validity of Rule 13.3.1.5 of the Development Control Rules ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Quashing Reservation Condition in Development Permission Dispute. MHADA Housing Reservation Deleted by Sanctioned Modification to Development Plan, Municipal Corporation Cannot Insist on Compliance.

The petitioner, Cosmos Constructions, a partnership firm, owned land at Chitalsar, Manpada, Thane. The Thane Municipal Corporation (TMC) imposed Condi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Lease of Wankhede Stadium to Mumbai Cricket Association. Court holds that lease of public property at nominal rent for promoting sports is not arbitrary and is a valid policy decision.

The petitioners, including Aam Aadmi Party and individuals, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challeng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Lease of Playground to Trust for School Construction. Lease of Public Land for Educational Purpose Held Valid as Playground Not Reserved as Recreational Ground in Development Plan.

The petitioners, residents of Oshiwara and Lokhandwala area of Mumbai, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) on 13/08/2012 challenging the lease of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Against National Sports Club of India Construction, Upholding Environmental and Municipal Permissions. Court finds no violation of CRZ or heritage regulations and rejects allegations of illegal construction as motivated by private interests.

The petitioner, Society for Promotion of Equality, Awareness and Rights (SPEAR), filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court seeki...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Road Construction Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Petitioners' Challenge to Notification Under Section 4 and Declaration Under Section 6 Fails as Court Finds No Violation of Statutory Requirements or Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioners, residents of Pernem, Goa, filed a writ petition challenging the acquisition of their land for the construction of a road by the State...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Illegal Construction in Residential Zone. Unauthorized construction in residential zone without valid development permission is liable for demolition under MRTP Act and BMC Act.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Sharvan Developers Private Limited and others, and by Jayesh Mehta and others, challenging a demolition ...