Search Results for "recovery after retirement"

544 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 544 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Employees to Continue as Members of Salary Earners' Credit Co-operative Society and Retain Voting Rights. Retirement does not automatically terminate membership unless bye-laws provide otherwise.

The case involves five retired employees of the Irrigation Department of the Government of Maharashtra who were members of Sinchan Karmachari Sahkari ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Recovery from Pension for Alleged Overstay in Corporation Premises. Recovery of Accommodation Charges Without Notice and Opportunity Violates Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Smt. Shilpa Liladhar Tayare, a former employee of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM), retired as Chief Inspector (Enqu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition of Superannuated Employee for Retiral Benefits with Interest - Disciplinary Proceedings Abate Upon Superannuation Under Gujarat Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1971, and Punishment Order Passed After Retirement Is Without Jurisdiction.

The petitioner, Harikrishna Mohanlal Thakkar, was serving as Chief General Manager with the Gujarat State Civil Supply Corporation Ltd. He was subject...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Retired KVIC Employee Challenging Withdrawal of Pension and Recovery of Paid Pension. Pension is a Right, Not a Bounty, and Cannot Be Withdrawn Without Statutory Authority Under Regulation 15 of KVIC Employees Pension Regulations 1984.

The petitioner, A.K. Kumaran Nair, joined the U.P. Khadi and Village Industries Board on 15 June 1982. The Board was taken over by the Khadi and Villa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Benefits to Retired Bank Employee Despite Delay in Deposit of Contribution Amount Under Joint Note Dated 27 April 2010. The court held that the three-day period for deposit was unreasonable and that the petitioner's substantial compliance warranted granting pension.

The petitioner, Ramesh Gajanan Nigudkar, joined the Bank of Baroda as a subordinate staff member on 4 March 1967 and retired after 39 years of unblemi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Employer's Disciplinary Action in Misconduct Case — Reinstatement Award Quashed. Charge-Sheet Issued Before Superannuation Validates Continuation of Inquiry After Retirement Under Service Regulation 72.

The petitioner, Dakshin Gujarat Vij Company Ltd., challenged the judgment and award dated 01.01.2025 passed by the learned Industrial Tribunal, Vadoda...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reduction of Pension and Recovery of Excess Payment. Employer's Order Reducing Pay Fixed at Retirement and Recovering Excess Amount Set Aside as Violative of Principles of Natural Justice and Unreasonable.

The petitioner, Vijay Sambrao Bharati, a retired employee of Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran, challenged an order of his employer that reduced the pay ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows State's Petition, Upholds Reduction in Pension of Retired Jailor for Misconduct. Disciplinary Proceedings Validly Continued After Superannuation Under Rule 27(2) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1979.

The State of Maharashtra filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal which had set aside the punishment of ...