Search Results for "reciprocal promise"

70 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 70 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Trial and Appellate Courts. Agreement to Sell Does Not Confer Ownership; Plaintiff Failed to Prove Payment of Consideration and Possession.

The appellant, original plaintiff, filed a Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and decree d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Madras Hears First Appeal against Denial of Specific Performance in Sale Agreement. Trial Court Denied Specific Performance Due to Non-Deposit of Balance Consideration, Appeal Filed Under Section 96 CPC.

The dispute arose from a sale agreement dated 29.02.2016 between the appellant/plaintiff and respondent/defendant for purchase of the suit property fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Directs Refund of Forfeited Auction Amount in SARFAESI Sale Due to Bank's Failure to Issue Sale Certificate. Bank's Failure to Perform Reciprocal Promise Discharges Bidder from Obligation to Pay Balance.

The petitioner, Sri Kalyanamurthy K., participated in an e-auction conducted by the State Bank of India (respondent) for the sale of an immovable prop...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Lok Adalat Award in BSNL Dues Dispute — Lack of Consent Invalidates Compromise. Permanent Lok Adalat exceeded jurisdiction by adjudicating without consent of parties under Section 22C of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987.

The petitioner, M/s. Mac Charles (I) Ltd, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, had subscribed to telephone lines from the respondent, B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Lok Adalat Award in BSNL Dues Dispute — Lack of Consent Invalidates Compromise. Permanent Lok Adalat Cannot Pass Award Without Parties' Consent Under Section 22C of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987.

The petitioner, M/s. Mac Charles (I) Ltd, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, had subscribed to telephone lines from the respondent, B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition in Railway Concession Dispute — Directs Release of Iron Ore Consignment. Circular Offering 30% Concession on Iron Ore Transport Held Applicable to Consignments Booked Before Withdrawal.

The petitioners, M/s Kumaraswamy Mineral Exports (exporter) and NECC Roadways (transporter), filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the C...