Search Results for "proximity restrictions"

87 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 87 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Rape and Atrocities Case Against Boyfriend: Consent Under Promise of Marriage Not Vitiated When Promise Was Not False From Inception. Distinction Between 'Breach of Promise' and 'False Promise' Reiterated Under Section 376(2)(n) IPC and SC/ST Act.

The applicant, Vaibhav Deshpande, filed a criminal application under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of FIR No. 338/2022 and the charge-sheet regist...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner Association's Challenge to Bio-stimulant Regulation Under Fertilizer Control Order. Bio-stimulants Held to Be Fertilizers Under Essential Commodities Act, 1955, and Their Regulation Under Fertilizer (Inorganic, Organic or Mixed) (Control) Order, 1985 Is Valid.

The petitioner, M/s. Organic Agro Manufactures Association, an association of bio-stimulant manufacturers, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind to Bail Grant. Failure to Consider Petitioner's Release on Bail in Sessions Case No.79/2022 Rendered Detention Order Invalid.

The petitioner, Vijay Baburao Avhad, challenged the detention order dated 19.05.2022 passed by the District Magistrate, Ahmednagar under Section 3(2) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rule M-3 of DCPR for Satara Region as Ultra Vires. Rule requiring 12m wide access road for plot subdivision is a valid development control regulation under MRTP Act, 1966 and does not amount to uncompensated acquisition.

The petitioners, Suhas Shridhar Shahane and Subhash Kondiram Sawant, landowners in Satara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Quash FIR in Sushant Singh Rajput Death Case — Allegations of Abetment to Suicide and Drug Nexus Require Investigation. Court holds that FIR prima facie discloses cognizable offences under IPC and NDPS Act, and quashing at threshold is not warranted.

The petitioners, sisters of the deceased actor Sushant Singh Rajput, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Setting Aside of Dismissal of Judicial Officers for Non-Recording of Reasons Under Article 311(2)(b). Liberty to Initiate Fresh Proceedings with Proper Reasons Upheld as Valid.

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals by three judicial officers—Hari Niwas Gupta, Komal Ram, and Jitendra Nath Singh—who were dismissed from s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against Termination by District Central Cooperative Bank, Holding It Not a State Under Article 12. Cooperative Bank Employee's Challenge to Dismissal Fails as DCC Bank Is Not an Instrumentality of the State and No Violation of Natural Justice Established.

The petitioner, Kiran Rangnath Kale, was employed as a Manager at the Beed District Central Cooperative Bank (respondent No. 3). He was initially appo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Culpable Homicide Case Due to Unreliable Extrajudicial Confession and Right of Private Defence. Conviction under Section 304 Part I IPC set aside as the alleged confession was a qualified admission of self-defence and prosecution witnesses were unreliable.

The appellant, Sheshreddi Changati, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhandara, for the offence punishable under Section 304 Part I of t...