Search Results for "proper adjudication"

4207 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4207 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute Over Succession and Title — Upholds Trial Court's Finding That Plaintiff Failed to Prove Ownership. Succession Certificate Not Conclusive Proof of Title; Plaintiff Must Establish Independent Right to Property.

The appellant, Madhukar Venkatesh Ullal, filed a suit in the Bombay High Court seeking declaration of title and possession of a property. He claimed t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7370 OF 2026

The present Civil Appeal arises from a suit for declaration of ownership of agricultural properties based on a Will dated 20.04.2018, allegedly execut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Impleadment of Third Parties in Suit for Possession Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC — Land Dispute Involving Claim of Possession for 60 Years. The court held that persons in possession of suit land are proper parties whose impleadment is necessary for effective adjudication.

The present petition was filed by the petitioners-original plaintiffs under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 challenging the re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Quashing of Revisional Order in Execution Proceedings. Decree Against Single Defendant Without Adjudication Held Null and Void Under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Order VIII Rule 10, Rendering Execution Incompetent.

The dispute originated from a civil suit filed by the appellants under section 38 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, seeking a permanent injunction aga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 25700 OF 2025

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Discharge of Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Conspiracy or Misappropriation. Applicant, a Medical Superintendent, was not shown to have any role in the alleged conspiracy or misappropriation of government funds.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Dr. Narendra Mawale, accused No.5 in Special Case No.5 of 2009, challenging the order dated...