Search Results for "promotion dispute"

1216 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1216 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Sealed Cover Promotion Case — Prosecution for Criminal Charge Must Be Pending Before Court to Invoke Sealed Cover Procedure. OM dated 14.09.1992 Clause (iii) Requires Actual Pendency of Criminal Prosecution, Not Mere Investigation or Sanction.

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India against the judgment of the Delhi High Court which upheld the order of the Central Administrative Tr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Education Officer's Order Directing Seniority Revision and Promotion After Petitioner Already Promoted — Education Officer Lacks Jurisdiction Under Rule 12 of MEPS Rules Once Promotion Is Granted.

The petitioner, Girish Suresh Jambhalikar, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher on 10.07.1995 in a school run by respondent No.3 Management. He posse...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Artisan Staff Challenging Grade-Wise Seniority in Indian Navy. Promotion Policy Based on Combined Seniority Roster Upheld as Valid and Non-Discriminatory.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by Artisan Staff of the Indian Navy challenging the common judgment of the Central Administrativ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Assistant Professors' Promotion Under DACP Scheme Against Statutory Corporation's Recruitment Regulations. Promotion Governed by DACP Scheme as ESIC Regulations Issued Without Prior Central Government Approval Under Section 17(2)(a) of Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948.

The dispute arose from the promotion of Assistant Professors employed by the Employees' State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) to the post of Associate Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in MACP Scheme Financial Upgradation Dispute. Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme Entitles Employees to Next Higher Grade Pay, Not Grade Pay of Next Promotional Post.

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India against orders of various High Courts and Central Administrative Tribunals...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Punjab State Power Corporation in Pay Parity Dispute Between Head Clerks and Internal Auditors. Internal Auditors Not Entitled to Same Pay Scale as Head Clerks Due to Different Recruitment, Duties, and Promotional Avenues.

The case involves a dispute between the Punjab State Power Corporation Limited (appellant) and Rajesh Kumar Jindal and others (respondents), who are I...