Search Results for "penalty under Excise Rules"

418 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 418 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court's Landmark Decision on Valuation Under Central Excise Act, 1944: Bharat Petroleum vs. Commissioner of Central Excise" "Defining Transaction Value in the Sale of Petroleum Products Between Public Sector Undertakings Under the Central Excise Act."

The judgment clarifies the determination of "transaction value" under Section 4(1) of the Central Excise Act for sales made between public sector oil ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Central Excise Duty Demand and Penalty. Petitioner failed to show any jurisdictional error or perversity in concurrent findings of fact regarding duty demand and penalty under Central Excise Rules.

The petitioner, M/s. Mandovi Ispat Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Bombay at ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case on Unjust Enrichment. Bar of Unjust Enrichment Not Applicable to Provisional Assessment Cases Prior to Amendment of Rule 9B of Central Excise Rules, 1944.

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-III Commissionerate, against the judgment of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case on Interest Liability for Provisional Assessment. Section 11DD of Central Excise Act, 1944 not applicable to differential duty determined on finalization of provisional assessment under Rule 9B of Central Excise Rules, 1944.

The appellant, Godrej Industries Limited, was engaged in the manufacture of Liquid Hair Dye during the period from September 1982 to March 1985. The d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue Appeals in Central Excise Classification and Cenvat Credit Disputes. The court held that the definition of 'input service' under the Cenvat Credit Rules is broad and classification of goods must be based on predominant function and commercial understanding.

The judgment involves a batch of appeals filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against orders...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Partnership Firm and Partner Against Penalty Under Customs Act — Double Jeopardy Plea Rejected. Penalty on firm and partner under Section 112 of Customs Act, 1962 is permissible as firm is a separate entity for penalty purposes.

The appeal arose from an order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) dated 12 February 2004, which reduced penalties impo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Central Excise Case — Interest Under Section 11AB Cannot Be Waived. Mandatory Interest Provision Requires Payment of Interest on Delayed Duty Even if Penalty Is Waived.

The case involves an appeal by the Revenue (Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs) against an order of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Extended Period Demand Under Section 11A of Central Excise Act — Suppression of Facts Justifies Extended Limitation. Forgings Classified Under Chapter 84 as Machinery Parts, Not Eligible for Exemption Under Notification No.223/88.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by M/s Rajkumar Forge Limited and its director challenging orders of the Commissioner of Central...