Search Results for "patent illegality"

1383 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1383 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Demurrage Dispute — Engine Trouble Does Not Suspend Laytime Under Charterparty. Charterer's claim for exclusion of time due to vessel's engine problem rejected as laytime had already commenced and no exception clause applied.

The dispute arose from a Charterparty dated 15 November 2010 between Steel Authority of India Ltd. (charterer/appellant) and Pacific Gulf Shipping Co....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Leave and License Dispute — Petitioner's Breach of Agreement Upheld. Arbitrator's Award of Rs. 90 Lakhs Damages with Interest Not Patently Illegal Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Ropa Plastics Private Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Derivative Transaction Dispute. Challenge Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Fails as Award Not Patently Illegal or Perverse.

The appeal arose from a judgment of a learned Single Judge dated 6 July 2012 dismissing a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliatio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Broking Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be Contrary to Public Policy or Suffering from Patent Illegality.

The petitioner, Bombay Construction and Engineering Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute — No Patent Illegality Found. The court upheld the award granting balance machinery price and interest, rejecting claims of breach for non-procurement of insurance under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, M/s. Neptune Marine Pvt. Ltd., challenged an arbitral award dated 18 August 2008 and a modified award dated 30 January 2012 under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute. Court upholds rejection of Section 34 application, finding no patent illegality in award allowing contractor's claims despite alleged non-compliance with monthly claim submission clause.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Executive Engineer, appealed against an order of the District Judge-9, Pune, dated 5th July 2007, which rejected...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Property Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Findings Are Not Perverse or Contrary to Public Policy.

The case involves a challenge to an arbitral award passed in a dispute over an agreement to sell immovable property. The petitioners (claimants before...