Search Results for "panchayat union"

568 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 568 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petition for Permanency Benefits by Daily Wager Due to Delay and Latches. Long service from 1984 to 2017 does not entitle employee to claim permanency after retirement without explanation for delay; petition under Article 226 dismissed.

The petitioner, Chandulal Bhimabhai Parsonda, was appointed as a daily wager by Patidad Gram Panchayat (respondent No.4) vide Resolution No.6 dated 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Consideration of Representation in Panchayat Drainage Dispute. Court Orders Statutory Authority to Decide on Relocation and Maintenance of Drainage Systems Within Three Months Without Expressing Views on Merits.

The petitioner, B. Kannan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court seek...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contract Workmen's Wage Parity Claim Against Principal Employer. Existence of Agreement with Representative Union Precludes Non-Members from Claiming Higher Wages Under Contract Labour Act.

The petition was filed by Mumbai Electric Employees Union, a non-representative union of contract workmen, challenging the order of the Additional Lab...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Village Panchayath Resolution and Taluk Panchayath Approval for Lack of Notice to Petitioner. Resolution passed without notice to the petitioner, who is the owner of the property, violates principles of natural justice under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Sri Malledevirappa, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash a resolution dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions by Non-Members Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Gram Panchayat Members — Petitioners Lack Locus Standi. No-Confidence Motion Validly Passed Under Section 49 of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993.

The petitioners, who are residents and social workers of Ujani village, filed writ petitions challenging the no-confidence motion passed against the m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification of Village Panchayat Member Under Bombay Village Panchayat Act. Disqualification order set aside for non-compliance with Section 16(2) requirement of personal hearing.

The petitioner, Popat S/o Bajirao Gaikwad, was an elected member of the Gram Panchayat of Nithurd, Taluka Majalgaon, District Beed. The first responde...