Search Results for "notice under CPC"

3563 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3563 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition, Quashes Order Dismissing Application for Return of Plaint for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Plaint Fails to Disclose Cause of Action Under Section 20 CPC, Order VII Rule 10 CPC.

The petitioner, M/s. Sekar Poultry Feeds (an unregistered firm represented by its proprietor Chettiarhan Kandaramy), was the defendant in Commercial O...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010792792011_1

Background: The dispute centered around two agricultural lands in Kenchanahalli village originally owned by one Siddagirigowda. His first wife Thopamm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Transfer Application Under CPC Section 24 in Trademark Infringement Suit — Maintainability of Interim Application Questioned. Registrar of Trade Marks' Status as Subordinate Court Under CPC and Proper Forum for Transfer Application Examined.

The matter concerns an application for transfer of trademark rectification proceedings from the Registrar of Trade Marks to the Bombay High Court, to ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Return of Plaint in Suit for Specific Performance of Land in Delhi. Leave under Clause XII of Letters Patent Granted by High Court Survives Transfer to City Civil Court Under Section 16(d) CPC.

The appellant, Nouveau Exports Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale dated 20th October 2000 in respect of propert...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Stay of Execution Proceedings in Possession Suit — Order 21 Rule 29 CPC Cannot Be Invoked After Decree Is Passed. Execution Court Erred in Staying Execution Based on Subsequent Suit Filed by Judgment Debtor After Decree.

The petitioners (decree holders) obtained a decree for possession in O.S. No. 79/2003 (originally O.S. No. 3/1971) against the respondent (judgment de...