High Court Upholds Rent Control Act, Denying Britannia’s Claim for Market Rent
8 Aug 2024The fixation of standard rent for an upscale apartment in Mumbai, which was rented to Maya Sunil Alagh, the wife of Britannia's former Managing Direct...
Search Results for "narrow interpretation"
910 result(s) found
Found 910 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal of Co-operative Society in Rent Control Ejectment Suit — Society Not Entitled to Protection Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 as Paid-up Capital Exceeds Rs.1 Crore. Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Try Suit for Ejectment Where Tenant is Exempted from Rent Act.
25 Apr 2024The dispute pertains to a suit property located on the first floor of a building in Kolhapur, originally owned by Ramrao Mahadev Misal and leased to S...
- 50
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Commercial Dispute Over Coal Handling Services. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's finding that allegations of fraud were not serious enough to render dispute non-arbitrable and rejects challenge to award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
8 Nov 2023The case involves a Commercial Arbitration Petition filed by Maharashtra Power Generation Company Ltd. (Petitioner) seeking to set aside an arbitral a...
- 62
High Court
Bombay High Court Rules on Automatic Stay of Arbitral Awards Under Section 26 of the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015. The Mere Filing of a Section 34 Petition Does Not Trigger Automatic Stay; Award-Holder Can Execute Unless Stay Granted.
3 Mar 2017The snippet of the judgment deals with Chamber Summonses in Execution Applications arising from an arbitral award. The dispute involves Enercon GmbH a...
High Court
KAHC010479002008_1
3 Dec 2015The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a consolidated batch of writ petitions filed by various entities including National Mineral Development ...
- 12
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification on Mining Leases; Examines Legislative Competence under Karnataka Forest Act and Forest (Conservation) Act.
3 Dec 2015A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka challenging the validity of Notification No. FEE/23/2007-08 dated 16.08.2008 is...
- 10
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Concerning Forest Development Tax on Mining Leases Under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963; Constitutional Validity of Section 98A and Notification Examined. The petitioners contended that the notification dated 16.08.2008 and demand of forest development tax from holders of mining leases in forest areas were repugnant to the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and ultra vires the State's legislative competence.
3 Dec 2015A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by various entities inc...
- 21
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Forest Notification as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws — Mining Companies Allege Notification Violates Article 246 and Entry 54 of Union List, Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980
3 Dec 2015The matter involved multiple writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by several mining corporations and mineral industries, including ...
- 32
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Considers Validity of Transit Fee Levy on Forest Produce Under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act, 1927. High Court Judgments on Transit Fee Rules Challenged in Batch of Appeals from Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh.
1 Jan 1970This batch of cases before the Supreme Court arose from multiple writ petitions challenging the levy of transit fee on forest produce imposed by the S...
- 18
