Search Results for "minor suspect"

191 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 191 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court confirmed conviction of Accused in Murder Case Due to reliable Evidence and Procedures. Conviction under Section 302 IPC sustained as prosecution proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appeal arose from a conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of the appellant's wife, sentenced to life imprisonment. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Minor Eyewitnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as three minor witnesses were not present at the scene and their testimonies were inconsistent.

The appellant, Ranjeet Singh, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of Devnath/Deonath on 15.01.2010. The tria...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d)(ii) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Pradeep H. Harwalkar, a Junior Passenger Assistant with Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd., was convicted by the Special Court for CBI in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302/34 IPC and Section 120B IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Conspiracy and Involvement of Accused Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to the murder of two individuals, Raja Mohammed (D1) and Raj Mohammed (D2), on the night of 28 December 1990 near Sarayananthal, Pap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Unreliable Prosecutrix Testimony and Lack of Medical Evidence. Conviction under Sections 376 and 506 IPC set aside as inconsistencies in evidence created reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Dattatray @ Kashinath Babaso Khatal, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, for offences under Sections 376 (rape) and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unreliable Testimony. Conviction under Section 376(2)(i) IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Mangesh Chandankhede, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-1, Nagpur, for offences under Section 376(2)(i) of the Indian Pena...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Rape and Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Rajratan Sahebrao Nawghare, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Nanded, in Special Case (POCSO) No.10/2013 for offences under Section ...