Search Results for "major victim"

742 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 742 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Consent of Minor Victim Not Valid, but Prosecution Failed to Prove Penetrative Sexual Assault Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ketan Sanjay Kokate, was convicted by the Special Judge, POCSO, Pune for offences under Section 376 IPC and Section 3 punishable under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rape and Poisoning Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 376 and 328 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Sheshappa Gowda, was convicted by the II Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Dakshina Kannada, Mangalore in Spl.Case No.4/2008...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of 717-Day Delay in Victim's Appeal Against Acquittal Under Section 302 IPC. Victim's Right to Appeal Under Proviso to Section 372 CrPC Is Not Subject to Limitation Period.

The applicant, Ranjana Shantilal Suryawanshi, mother of the deceased Sujata, filed a criminal application seeking condonation of delay of 717 days in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in POCSO Case for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault on 9-Year-Old Boy. Court holds that testimony of child victim alone, if credible, is sufficient for conviction under Section 4 of POCSO Act, 2012.

The appellant, Mahesh Sambhaji Chafle, was convicted by the Special Judge, Hingoli, under Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape and Kidnapping Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Benefit of Doubt. Conviction under Sections 363, 366-A, 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Lahu Bhausaheb Sonwane, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Shrirampur, for offences under Sections 363, 366-A, and 376 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Order Sending Victim to Corrective Institution in Immoral Traffic Case — Victim's Consent and Best Interest Not Considered. Father's Application Allowed; Victim to Be Released to Parental Custody.

The applicant, Nagar Macchindra Bhui, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the order da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in SC/ST Act and Section 377 IPC Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for unnatural sex and caste-based atrocity set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Dattatraya Ramchandra Sutar, was convicted by the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli, for offences under Section 377 of the Indian...