Search Results for "lokayukta"

321 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 321 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand. High Court's reversal of conviction for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w Section 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 upheld as prosecution failed to prove demand of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal filed by the State of Karnataka against the acquittal of the respondent, Chandrasha, by the High Court of Karnataka. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Appeal Challenging Conviction Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Accused Surveyor Had Been Found Guilty of Demanding and Accepting Bribe for Conducting Land Survey.

This criminal appeal was preferred by a Second Division Surveyor against his conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, by the trial cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reinstates Compulsory Retirement in Disciplinary Proceeding Despite Criminal Acquittal. Disciplinary Authority's Finding of Misconduct Upheld as Independent of Criminal Trial Outcome Under Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 and Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appeals arose from a judgment of the Karnataka High Court which set aside a compulsory retirement order imposed on a Village Accountant following ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision and Quash Petitions in Corruption Case Against RTO Officials. Prima Facie Case Exists Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Based on Trap and Recovery of Bribe.

The judgment pertains to two connected petitions arising from Special Case No.35/2015 pending before the Principal District and Sessions Judge and Spe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeal Against Conviction of Accused in Prevention of Corruption Act Case. Appellant, a surveyor, challenged conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of the Act, contending that sanction order was invalid and amount received was legal fees.

The appeal before the High Court of Karnataka arose from the judgment of the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tumkur, in Special Case No.67/...