Search Results for "legal bar"

6664 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6664 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Bar Council Elections and Advocate General's Ex-Officio Membership. Court upholds Advocate General's membership in Bar Council under Section 55 of Advocates Act, 1961 and dismisses allegations of electoral irregularities.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the composition and election of the Bar Council of Maharash...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Disposes of Criminal Petitions Seeking Quashing of Proceedings Under Mines and Minerals Act. The Petitions Challenged Registration of Cases Under IPC and MMRD Act, 1957, Claiming Lack of Authorized Complaint Under Section 22.

The High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench, presided by Justice H.P. Sandesh, heard a batch of twelve criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in SARFAESI Act Case on Jurisdictional Grounds. Civil Suit Barred Under Section 34 as Debt Recovery Tribunal Has Exclusive Authority Over Securitisation Matters, Despite Allegations of Fraud in Assignment Agreement.

The dispute arose from a loan agreement dated 26.07.2011, where the appellant acted as a guarantor for a corporate debtor. After the corporate debtor ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in MRTP Act Case — Notice Under Section 53(1) Challenged as Nullity for Shortfall in Statutory Period. Bar Under Section 149 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Does Not Apply When Notice Itself Is Invalid for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Period.

The appellant, Kishor S/o Ramalu @ Rambhau Telang, was the original plaintiff who received a notice dated 18.11.2010 under Section 53(1) of the Mahara...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers Matter to Chief Justice on Advocates' Misconduct in Vexatious SLP Filing. Advocates Filed Second SLP with Incorrect Statements After Dismissal of First, Tendered Unconditional Apology, Leading to Divergent Judicial Opinions Under Supreme Court Rules, 2013.

The Supreme Court was confronted with a case involving misconduct by advocates in filing a vexatious special leave petition. The petitioner, convicted...