Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Permanent Injunction — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Possession Over Suit Property. The Court held that the plaintiff must succeed on the strength of his own title and possession, not on the weakness of the defendants' case, and that the concurrent findings of fact by the courts below cannot be interfered with under Section 100 CPC unless a substantial question of law arises.
20 Jan 2025The plaintiff, Rajaraman, filed a suit for permanent injunction against the defendants, Ravi and Sekar, claiming that he was in possession and enjoyme...
