Search Results for "kidnapping minor"

287 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 287 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Cancels Bail in POCSO Case Due to Suppression of Material Facts and Failure to Consider Gravity of Offence -- High Court's Bail Order Set Aside as Perverse and Unjustified

The Supreme Court allowed the criminal appeal challenging the High Court's bail order in a case involving serious sexual offences against a minor -- T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under POCSO Act and IPC for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault and Kidnapping. Trial Court Had Imposed 20 Years Rigorous Imprisonment for Offences Against a Minor.

The appellant, original accused no.1, was convicted in Special (POCSO) Case No.94/2017 by the Extra Joint District Judge and Additional Sessions Judge...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Restores Conviction for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault Under POCSO Act Despite Victim's Consent and Cohabitation. Consent of a Minor Is Irrelevant for Offences Under the POCSO Act and Section 376 IPC, and the High Court Exceeded Its Jurisdiction by Acquitting Based on Such Consent.

The Supreme Court of India dealt with a suo motu writ petition and a criminal appeal arising from a judgment of the Calcutta High Court. The backgroun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeal Against Conviction and Reference for Confirmation of Death Sentence in Kidnap, Rape and Murder of Minor Girl. Court Considers Whether Evidence Justified Conviction Under IPC and POCSO Act and If Death Sentence Should Be Confirmed Under Section 366 CrPC.

The High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, considered a criminal appeal and a death sentence reference arising from the conviction of Manjunathgouda ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused for Kidnapping, Rape, and Murder of Minor Girl Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Last Seen Theory and Failure to Explain Under Section 106 Evidence Act Confirm Guilt Under Sections 366A, 376(2)(f), 302 IPC.

The appellant, Vijay Babasaheb Nanavare, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik in Sessions Case No. 88 of 2006 for kidnapping a minor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Kidnapping Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Taking or Enticing Minor. Prosecution Fails to Prove Essential Ingredients of Section 363 IPC as Minor Victim's Testimony Does Not Establish That She Was Taken Away by Accused.

The appellants, Sau. Banu Ramchandra Borgaonkar and Sandip Kedar Pande, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, for offences under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping Under Section 363 IPC in Child Abduction Case. Court Confirms that Taking a Minor Without Consent of Guardian Constitutes Kidnapping, Rejecting Defense of Consent by Child's Mother.

The appellant, Salman Sufiyan Shaikh, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Borivali Division, Dindoshi, Mumbai, in Sessions Case No.138 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape and Kidnapping Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Consent. Conviction under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Lack of Consent and Age of Victim Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Govind Shripat Maraskolhe, was convicted by the Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha in Sessions Trial No. 56/2006 for offences und...