Search Results for "jurisdictional infirmity"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "jurisdictional infirmity"

293 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 293 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Unproven Age of Victim and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Sections 366A, 344, 376(2)(n) IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim's minority beyond reasonable doubt.

1 Jul 2025

The appellant, Anil S/o Bhayrappa Khairav, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, FTSC-I (POCSO), Vijayapura, in Special Case (POCSO) No.15/2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application of Lessor in Rent Control Exclusion Case. Company That Lost Rent Control Protection Due to High Paid-Up Share Capital Cannot Regain It by Subsequent Reduction.

4 Oct 2024

The case involves a dispute between M/s. Depe Global Shipping Agencies Pvt. Ltd. (Plaintiff/Lessor) and M/s. Mather and Platt (India) Ltd. (Defendant/...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Stamp Duty Reassessment Order Due to Violation of Natural Justice and Non-Application of Mind. Collector's order set aside for failing to consider petitioner's objections and relying on unsubstantiated ready reckoner rates without providing opportunity of hearing.

4 Mar 2024

The petitioner, Crystal Construction Company, challenged an order dated 16 September 2021 passed by the Collector of Stamps, Andheri, which adjudicate...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in UAPA Jurisdiction Case — Sessions Court Has Power to Add UAPA Offences When No Special Court Notified by State Government. The Court held that under Section 22(3) of the NIA Act, the Sessions Court is the exclusive trial court for UAPA offences when no Special Court is constituted by the State Government, and the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate retains remand jurisdiction.

1 Jan 2024

The State of West Bengal appealed against the Calcutta High Court's order quashing proceedings under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (U...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Interim Injunction in Shareholder Dispute Over Share Transfer Agreement — Agreement dated 14th June 2019 Held Valid and Enforceable.

23 Sep 2022

The dispute arises out of a Share Purchase Agreement dated 14th June 2019 between the Kamdar Group (appellants) and the Sanghvi Group (respondents) fo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants for Counterfeit Currency Offences Under IPC Sections 489B and 489C. Recovery of Fake Notes from Exclusive Possession and Circumstantial Evidence Sufficient to Establish Guilt.

3 Jul 2019

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by Sheikh Asif (A1) and Abdul Khalik (A2) against their conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ward...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Doubtful Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

8 Feb 2019

The appellant, Asif Pasha @ Asif, was convicted by the Principal Sessions Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, for the murder of one person under Section ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes CVC Order Divesting CBI Director of Powers — Rule of Law and Institutional Independence Upheld. The court held that the CVC exceeded its powers under Section 8(1)(a) and 8(1)(b) of the CVC Act, 2003 read with Section 4(1) of the DSPE Act, 1946, and that the divestment of the CBI Director's functions without due process violated the rule of law.

8 Jan 2019

The judgment arises from two writ petitions challenging the legality of three orders dated 23 October 2018. The first order was passed by the Central ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes CVC Order Divesting CBI Director of Powers — Rule of Law and Institutional Independence Upheld. The court held that the CVC exceeded its powers under Section 8(1)(a) and 8(1)(b) of the CVC Act, 2003 read with Section 4(1) of the DSPE Act, 1946, and that the orders were invalid as they undermined the independence of the CBI Director.

8 Jan 2019

The judgment arises from two writ petitions challenging the legality of three orders dated 23rd October 2018. The first order was passed by the Centra...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Preliminary Investigation Report and FIR in Lokayukta Corruption Case — Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC and Section 19 PC Act. Investigation Initiated Without Valid Sanction Against Public Servant is Void Ab Initio.

22 Aug 2016

The petitioner, Sri C. Mruthyunjayaswamy, a Chief Engineer in the National Highways department, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of th...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)