Search Results for "interruption"

210 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 210 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition for Lack of Jurisdiction in Hotel Agreement Termination Dispute. Court holds that no part of cause of action arose within its territorial jurisdiction under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Rockwood Hotels & Resorts Limited, a company with its registered office in Mumbai, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Trust Property Dispute — Possession of Suit Plot Not Acquired by Government. Land Acquisition Proceedings Did Not Include the Suit Plot, Hence Government Cannot Claim Title or Possession Without Proper Acquisition Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 25.9.1995 of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Yavatmal, dismissing Special Civil Suit No.86/1994 f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Initiates Suo Motu Contempt Against Advocate for Disrupting Court Proceedings. Advocate's Rowdy Behavior and Improper Language in Court Amounts to Prima Facie Criminal Contempt Under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The High Court of Bombay, on its own motion, initiated contempt proceedings against Mr. N.B. Deshmukh, an advocate, based on an incident that occurred...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Case, Holds Compensation for Loss of Agency as Capital Receipt. Amount received by assessee for giving up right to use trade mark and resigning as director is capital receipt not taxable under Section 2(24) and Section 4 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal allowing the appeal of the assess...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals Against Execution of Decree for Possession, Holding That Objectors Claiming Adverse Possession Must First Establish Their Own Independent Title. Order XXI Rule 97 CPC Objections Cannot Be Used to Re-litigate Title Already Decided Against the Judgment Debtor.

The present appeals arise from execution proceedings initiated by the decree holder (respondent No. 1) to enforce a decree for possession of land adme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Doubtful Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove motive and chain of circumstances beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Chandrasen Maruti Dhotre, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Sangli in Sessions Case No. 111 of 1999 for the murder of his brother-in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by Hindustan Petroleum and Dealer in Eviction Suit — Lease Termination Valid Under Section 111(g) of Transfer of Property Act, 1882. Notice to Quit Properly Served and Not Waived by Acceptance of Rent.

The case involves two appeals arising from a suit for eviction filed by Dilip Prabhakar Dingorkar (the owner/lessor) against M/s. Hindustan Petroleum ...