Search Results for "interest refund"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "interest refund"

2362 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2362 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Customs to Refund Sale Proceeds with Interest Following Settlement Commission Order. Failure to Implement Settlement Order Within Reasonable Time Amounts to Unjust Enrichment and Arbitrary Action Under Article 226.

3 Apr 2013

The Petitioner, Vishnu M. Harlalka, approached the Bombay High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking implementation of an order dated 9 ...

Supreme Court

Non-Compliance with Section 38(3)(a)(ii) Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004, : Unjustified Retention of Refund Amounts

1 May 2024

Examining the violation of refund processing timeline and the implications on the adjustment of default notices. The case revolves around the issue o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award on Retention Money Refund. Jurisdictional Objection Under Section 16(2) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Must Be Raised at Earliest Opportunity.

4 Jan 2013

The case involves an appeal against a judgment of a Learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court, which affirmed an arbitral award granting refund of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Processing of Income Tax Return and Refund Under Section 143(1) Despite Pending Scrutiny Under Section 143(2) — CBDT Instruction No.1 of 2015 Quashed. The court held that the Assessing Officer cannot withhold refund merely because a scrutiny notice has been issued, as the provisions of Section 143(1) and 143(1D) are mandatory and independent of Section 143(2).

15 Oct 2016

The petitioner, M/s. Group M. Media India Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the inaction of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Unutilized Input Tax Credit for Export of Services Under IGST Act — Rejects Revenue's Contention of Non-Compliance with Pre-Audit Requirement. The court held that rule 96(10) of CGST Rules applies only to refund of integrated tax paid on export, not to refund of unutilized input tax credit under section 54 of CGST Act.

8 Mar 2021

The petitioner, BA Continuum India Pvt. Ltd., is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in providing information technology and...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of IGST on Exports Under Protest, Rejects Unjust Enrichment Claim. Payment under protest does not attract doctrine of unjust enrichment under Section 54 of CGST Act, 2017.

8 Apr 2024

The petitioner, Venus Jewel, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, challenging the refusa...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for Refund of Seigniorage Fee Paid Under Protest for Felled Trees on Granted Land. Payment under protest does not attract limitation and refund cannot be denied on unjust enrichment when payment was made under compulsion.

28 Nov 2024

The petitioner, N Mahabaleshwar Bhat (since deceased, represented by his legal heir Smt. Gayathry), filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 o...

High Court

High Court Quashes Tax Refund Adjustment Order for Violation of Settlement Scheme and Natural Justice. Adjustment of refund for one tax period against demand for another under proviso to Section 50(1) of Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 held invalid when petitioner had applied under Maharashtra Settlement of Arrears of Tax, Interest, Penalty or Late Fees Act, 2023 and no defect notice was issued.

12 Mar 2026

The dispute involved a proprietorship concern registered under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 challenging a settlement order dated 18 April...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partly Allows GMADA's Appeal in Consumer Case; Sets Aside Additional Loan Interest Award. Refund of Flat Purchase Amount with 8% Compound Interest Upheld as per Letter of Intent, but Directing Developer to Pay Interest on Home Loan Not Justified.

1 Jan 1970

The dispute arose from a residential scheme launched by Greater Mohali Area Development Authority (GMADA) for 'Purab Premium Apartments' in Sector 88,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Cess Paid Under Protest in Excise Matter — Unjust Enrichment Principle Not Applicable to Cess Under IDR Act. Section 11-B of Central Excise Act Held Inapplicable to Cess Collected Under Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951, and Refund Directed with Interest.

26 Apr 2005

The petitioners, Shree Vidhya Paper Mills and Mr. Rameshwarlal Motilal, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking refund of Rs. 10,19,246...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)