Search Results for "hybrid hearing"

145 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 145 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Dismisses Appeal Against NCLT Order Closing Section 9 Application After Full Payment of Principal Amount. Consent Terms Not Adhered to Does Not Revive Insolvency Petition When Entire Principal and Substantial Interest Paid.

The appeal was filed by United Futuristic Trade Impex Pvt. Ltd. (the Operational Creditor) against an order dated 22.01.2025 passed by the NCLT, Jaipu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Larger Bench Holds Shareholder/Promoter is an 'Aggrieved Person' Under Section 61 IBC and Has Locus to Challenge Section 7 Admission Order. The reference resolves conflicting views on maintainability of appeal by shareholder against admission of insolvency petition.

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) Chennai Bench, in a larger bench of three members, addressed a reference question: whether a share...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Bus Owner in Motor Accident Claim — Owner Held Liable for Compensation Due to Invalid Permit and Route Violation. Concurrent findings of fact that vehicle was plied without valid permit and on unauthorized route upheld; no interference warranted.

The appeal arose from a motor accident claim where the deceased, a 24-year-old Managing Director of a company, died in a collision with a bus owned by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Allows Appeals Against Rejection of Claims in CIRP, Remands for Fresh Consideration. The Tribunal held that the Resolution Professional must consider claims on merits after giving the claimants a fair hearing.

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Chennai bench, disposed of three company appeals (Nos. 231, 233 & 235 of 2025) filed under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Dismisses Appeal Against Approval of Resolution Plan for Lack of Standing — Appellant Not an Aggrieved Person Under Section 61 of IBC, 2016. The appellant, not being a party to the CIRP and whose claim was not admitted, lacks locus standi to challenge the order approving the resolution plan.

The case involves an appeal filed by Boorugu Infra Projects Private Limited in consortium with Vishwanath Projects Limited against the order of the Na...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Seed Inspector's Entry and Seizure Without Authorization Under Seeds Act, 1966. Entry and seizure of seeds from storage area without prior authorization under Section 14 of Seeds Act, 1966 held illegal and without jurisdiction.

The petitioner, Maharashtra Hybrid Seeds Co. (Pvt.) Ltd., is a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in the business of research, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Chennai Dismisses Appeal by Former Directors Against Order to Cooperate with IRP and Hand Over Possession in CIRP under Section 10 IBC. Directors of Corporate Debtor are obligated to cooperate with IRP and hand over custody of premises and assets during CIRP.

The present appeal was filed by Mr. M. Bhaskaran and Mr. M. Radhakrishnan, who were the opposite parties in IA(IBC)/913(CHE)/2025 before the National ...