Search Results for "haemorrhagic shock"

130 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 130 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) Decides Criminal Appeals Against Conviction and Acquittal in Land Dispute Murder Case. Convicted Accused Under Sections 147, 148, 302, 324, 325 read with 149 IPC and Section 135 Bombay Police Act Appeal; State Challenges Acquittal of Co-Accused on Same Charges.

The case arose from a land dispute in village Yelamwadi, Tq. Chakur, Dist. Latur. Muktabai, the complainant, lived with her husband and children. Her ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Direct Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Recovery of Ornaments Not Sufficient to Prove Homicide.

The appellant, Sharad s/o Mariba Choudhari, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, for the murder of Sunita and for dishonestly taki...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 302, 143, 149 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The judgment concerns three criminal appeals arising from a common trial. The appellants in Criminal Appeal No.125 of 2005, Bapusaheb Bhaguji Hande an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Both Convicts' and State's Appeals in Rioting and Murder Case — Conviction and Acquittal Affirmed. Court Reappreciates Evidence, Finds Inconsistencies Insufficient to Upset Trial Court's Findings.

The appeals arose from an incident on 8 August 1985 in village Hivare, Koregaon, District Satara, where two factions clashed following a dispute over ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Credible Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 302 and 307 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Abdul Arif Abdul Karim, was convicted by the Ad-hoc District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati, in Sessions Trial No.69 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant in Murder Case - Life Sentence Under Section 302 IPC Confirmed. Eye Witness Testimony and Recovery of Weapon Corroborate Prosecution Case, No Interference with Concurrent Findings.

The appellant, Kamlakar, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Dhammanand. The incident occurred on March 13, 200...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Doctor for Murder of Wife Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Chain of Circumstances Including Motive, Last Seen, and Recovery of Weapon Held Sufficient to Prove Guilt Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Dr. Rajendra Kapgate, a medical practitioner, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of his wife Neeta. The couple married ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Accused's Demand for Profit Share and Prior Threats Established Motive for Stabbing Deceased Contractor.

The appellant, Sunil Manoharrao Pandhare, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Gadchiroli, for the murder of a contractor who was his business partner...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Murder Based on Dying Declaration and Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC confirmed as deceased's oral dying declaration to his wife was found credible and corroborated by medical evidence.

The appellant, Suresh Deshmukh, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Sonu, a relative, and sentenced to life imp...