Search Results for "government service removal"

1747 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1747 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Removal of Judicial Officer in POCSO Bribery Case — Rule 5(1)(viii) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1979. Petitioner found guilty of accepting bribe through peon for acquittal in POCSO case; disciplinary proceedings and removal upheld.

The Petitioner, a Judicial Officer appointed in 2009, was removed from service by the State of Maharashtra under Rule 5(1)(viii) of the Maharashtra Ci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Contractual Employee Against Non-Extension of Contract — Order Held Stigmatic Requiring Enquiry. Termination Based on Unsatisfactory Work Grounds, Preceded by Allegations of Misconduct, Cannot Be Passed Without Following Principles of Natural Justice.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Swati Priyadarshini against the State of Madhya Pradesh and others, setting aside the Division Bench jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal of Teacher Challenging Removal from Service — Upholds Single Judge's Order. Appellant failed to establish permanent appointment and termination was not stigmatic, hence no violation of natural justice.

The appellant, Smt. Sujathamma R, was employed as a teacher at Sri Vani Education Center. She challenged her removal from service by filing W.P.No.233...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Probationary Constable in CISF. Petitioner Contends Discharge Was Stigmatic and Without Enquiry; Respondents Argue It Was Simpliciter Under Rule 25(2) of CISF Rules, 2001.

The petitioner, a Constable in the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF), filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds CAT Order Reinstating Suspended Police Officer Due to Non-Review Under Rule 3(8) of All India Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1969. Continued suspension beyond 90 days without mandatory review renders suspension illegal and without authority of law.

The State of Maharashtra and the Director General of Police filed a Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging ...