Search Results for "flat scheme"

817 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 817 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Rejection of Declaration under Income Declaration Scheme, 2016. The court quashed reassessment and prosecution notices under Section 276CC of Income Tax Act, 1961, holding that valid declaration under the Scheme grants immunity.

The petitioners, Umesh D. Ganore and Mangesh D. Ganore, filed two writ petitions challenging the decision of the Revenue Authority in not accepting th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Derequisition of Premises Under Bombay Land Requisition Act, 1948 — Petitioner Failed to Establish Entitlement as Requisition Was for Public Purpose and No Unauthorized Use Proven.

The Petitioners, All India Cotton Seeds Crushers' Association and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Bomb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Derequisition of Premises Under Bombay Land Requisition Act, 1948 — Petitioner Failed to Establish Bona Fide Need for Own Use and Acquiesced to Requisition for Over Two Decades.

The petitioners, All India Cotton Seeds Crushers' Association and another, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus to derequisition Flat Nos. 2 and 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging MHADA Housing Allotment — Petitioner's Challenge to Eligibility of Allottees Fails. Court holds that MHADA's decision to allot flats to respondents was within its administrative discretion and not arbitrary under Article 226.

The petitioner, Ved Prakash Gupta, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging the a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Injunction and Possession. The court held that under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, interference with concurrent findings of fact is not warranted unless there is a perverse finding or patent error of law.

The petitioner, Zircon Venture Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the ...