Search Results for "externment order vitiated"

95 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 95 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment on Writ Petitions Challenging Externment Orders Passed Under Section 55 of Maharashtra Police Act — Petitioners Contended That Exclusion of Two Gang Members Vitiates Proceedings

The case involves three criminal writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the legality of an externment order dated 3.2.2017 pass...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 for Non-Application of Mind to Bail Conditions. Detaining Authority Failed to Consider That Petitioner Was on Bail and Could Be Prosecuted Under Regular Law, Rendering Subjective Satisfaction Invalid.

The petitioner, Santosh Tukaram Chavan, was detained under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Mechanical Confirmation. Detenu's Preventive Detention Set Aside as Authorities Failed to Consider Relevant Material and Confirmatory Order Was Passed Without Independent Application of Mind.

The petitioner, Ashokrao Uttamrao Pawar, father of the detenu Umesh @ Bunty s/o Ashok Pawar, filed a Criminal Writ Petition challenging the detention ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Act Case for Non-Application of Mind. Preventive Detention Invalid as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Detenu's Bail Status in Pending Criminal Cases.

The petitioner, Kiran Dhanraj Kharat, challenged a detention order dated 13 December 2017 issued by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under the Mahara...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind. Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based on Mere Criminal Antecedents Without Evidence of Public Order Disturbance.

The petitioner, Ashok Kisan Jadhav, challenged his detention under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Communication of Basic Facts of Offences. Court Holds That Listing C.R. Numbers Without Factual Details Violates Article 22(5) Safeguards.

The petitioner challenged a preventive detention order passed under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Material to Support Apprehension of Bail. Detenu in Judicial Custody Without Bail Application; Detaining Authority's Satisfaction of Imminent Release Held Unsubstantiated.

The petitioner, Sagar Sunil Gaikwad, challenged an order of detention dated 27 September 2017 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Stale Grounds. Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based on Old Incidents Without Proximate Link to Public Order.

The petitioner, Adil Chaus, challenged an order of preventive detention passed by the Commissioner of Police, Aurangabad, on 30 August 2011 under Sect...