Search Results for "exclusive marks"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "exclusive marks"

440 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 440 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Interim Injunction Applications in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suits — No Prima Facie Case for Confusion Between 'Manugraph' and 'Simarq' or 'Ezeego' and 'La Travenues'. The court held that the marks are not deceptively similar and the goods/services are different, thus no interim relief is warranted under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

15 Jun 2016

The judgment involves two suits for trademark infringement and passing off. In Suit No. 516 of 2013, the plaintiff Manugraph India Limited sought to r...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Against Trademark Infringement in Favor of Plaintiff. Passing Off Claim Deferred Due to Pending Rectification Proceedings Under Section 124 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

11 Apr 2012

The plaintiffs, Hem Corporation Pvt. Ltd. and three individuals (erstwhile partners of a firm), filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — No Interim Relief Granted for Alleged Deceptive Similarity Between 'DEXORANGE' and 'LUPINEXORANGE'. The court held that the marks were visually and phonetically distinct, and the appellant failed to establish a prima facie case for interim injunction.

10 Feb 2017

The appellant, Franco-Indian Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal against an order of the learned Single Judge refusing to grant interim relief ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Petitioner in Trade Mark Rectification Case Due to Prior Rights and Dishonest Adoption. Impugned 'C21' Registrations Cancelled as Respondent Incorporated 'CENTURY 21' into Corporate Name and Registered Identical Marks Without Explanation, Violating Sections 11, 47, 57 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

6 Mar 2026

The dispute involved a multinational franchising company, the Petitioner, engaged in real estate business under the marks 'CENTURY 21' and 'C21', chal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Favor of Plaintiff in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit. Registered Trademark 'SACU-V' for Heart Failure Drug Protected Against Deceptively Similar Mark 'SACV' for Same Composition Pharmaceutical Product.

3 Sep 2024

The Plaintiff, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd., is engaged in manufacturing and sale of pharmaceutical preparations. It adopted the trademark 'SACU-V' i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Temporary Injunction in Trade Mark Infringement Suit — 'JAL DROP' Found Deceptively Similar to Registered Mark 'JEEVAN DROP'. The court affirmed that phonetic and conceptual similarity between marks for identical goods (Sodium Hypochlorite Solution) constitutes infringement under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

8 Feb 2016

The respondent, Mauli Chemicals Industries, a registered partnership firm manufacturing Sodium Hypochlorite Solution used as a drinking water disinfec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Injunction Against Appellant in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case — Similar Trade Dress Found Deceptively Similar Despite Different Word Marks. The court held that the essential features of the appellant's label were deceptively similar to the respondent's registered label, justifying an interlocutory injunction under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and the Copyright Act, 1957.

20 Aug 2013

The appeal arose from an interlocutory injunction granted by a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in a suit filed by Sopariwala Exports (the first ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Interim Injunction Application in Trademark Infringement Suit Over Descriptive Mark 'OCTRIDE'. Court holds that the mark is descriptive of the active ingredient Octreotide and lacks distinctiveness, and balance of convenience favors the defendant.

4 May 2026

The plaintiff, Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited, filed a commercial IP suit seeking an interim injunction to restrain the defendant, United Biotech Pri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against Passing Off and Trade Mark Infringement of 'CARTER'S BLUE' Mark. Defendants' Use of Deceptively Similar Names Despite Conducting Agreement and Registration Constitutes Passing Off.

16 Jun 2016

The plaintiff, Mehboob Khan, sole proprietor of 'Carter's Blue' restaurant, filed a suit for trade mark infringement and passing off against the defen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Temporary Injunction Against Defendant in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case. Plaintiff's Registered Mark 'RISO' for Rice Bran Oil Protected Against Deceptively Similar Mark 'RISOLITE' Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

9 May 2014

The Plaintiff, Kamani Oil Industries Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit against Bhuwaneshwar Refineries Pvt. Ltd. seeking a perpetual injunction for trademark in...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)