Search Results for "employer's mistake"

198 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 198 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Retired Teacher Against Recovery of Excess Salary Paid Mistakenly During Service. Recovery of Mistaken Payment After Retirement Held Illegal Following Supreme Court Precedent in State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih.

The petitioner, Lata Gajanan Wankhede, a retired Assistant Teacher employed with Zilla Parishad, Akola, filed a writ petition challenging the recovery...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pensionary Benefits for Broken Period Service in Government Polytechnic College Case. Court directs condonation of break from 13.06.1965 to 29.06.1966 for pensionable service under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982.

The petitioner, Deelip S/o Harishchandra Jadhav, a retired employee of Government Polytechnic College, Dhule, filed two writ petitions seeking pension...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Part in TDS Dispute Regarding Payments to Doctors by Hospital. Payments to doctors with fixed plus variable pay under written contracts treated as salary subject to TDS under Section 192 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case involves an appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Pune...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Lab Chemist Challenging Termination by Sugar Factory. Industrial Court's Order Setting Aside Reinstatement Upheld as Domestic Enquiry Was Fair and Proper Under MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Arvind s/o Ramnath Lipane, was employed as a Lab Chemist with the respondent, Mula Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., a sugar factory. Dur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Date of Birth Correction in School Record Due to Delay and Lack of Evidence. Petitioner sought correction after 30 years of service, but court held that belated application without contemporaneous evidence cannot be entertained under Article 226.

The petitioner, Azam Khan Pathan, was working as an Administrative Officer in Pratishthan Mahavidyalaya, Paithan, and was due for retirement within 7-...