Search Results for "district consumer commission"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "district consumer commission"

434 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 434 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by UP Housing Board, Sets Aside NCDRC Order Directing Allotment of Flat at Rs 2,50,000. Mere Registration Under Housing Scheme Does Not Confer Right to Allotment; Consumer Forum Cannot Compel Public Authority to Enter into Contract at Arbitrary Price.

1 May 2019

The appellant, UP Housing and Development Board, floated a scheme for Economically Weaker Sections in 1982. The respondent deposited Rs 500 in 1982 an...

Tribunals

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Dismisses Appeals by Builder Against Execution Orders in Consumer Complaints — Upholds State Commission's Directions for Compliance with Settlement Terms.

30 Nov -0001

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) heard a batch of appeals filed by M/s. Samar Estates Private Limited and its directors aga...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Estate Officer's Appeals in Leasehold to Freehold Conversion Dispute Under Consumer Protection Act. The court held that allottees paying conversion fee are consumers under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, and the Estate Officer's refusal based on an internal memo without public notification was arbitrary under the Chandigarh Conversion of Residential Leasehold Land Tenure into Freehold Land Tenure Rules, 1996.

7 Sep 2021

The dispute arose from the Estate Officer's refusal to convert leasehold residential plots in Chandigarh to freehold under the Chandigarh Conversion o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Electricity Distribution Company Challenging Consumer Forum Order Setting Aside Supplementary Bills. Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum Has Jurisdiction Under Section 42(5) of Electricity Act, 2003 to Adjudicate Disputes Regarding Defective Metering and Supplementary Bills.

18 Dec 2018

The Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL) filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 25.03.2017 passed by the Cons...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Petition, Upholds Medical Reimbursement for District Consumer Forum President. Member of District Consumer Forum is a government servant entitled to medical reimbursement under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

14 Jan 2016

The case involves a writ petition filed by the State of Maharashtra challenging an order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal (MAT) that directe...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Class Action in Consumer Dispute Over Non-Delivery of Commercial Units. The Court Held That Sameness of Interest, Not Identical Cause of Action, Is Required for Class Action Under Section 12(1)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

10 May 2019

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission dismissing a complaint filed by 44 appellants under Section 12...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 27(3) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Summary Trial for Non-Compliance Upheld. Section 27(3) is a complete code and does not violate Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

18 Jul 2013

The petitioner, Shri A. G. Sawant, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Order of State Commission in Consumer Dispute Over Defective Pumpkin Seeds; Directs Laboratory Testing Under Section 13(1)(c) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The Court held that an interlocutory order rejecting a request for seed analysis does not affect rights and is not appealable under Section 19, and that technical issues regarding seed expiry should be left to laboratory experts.

16 Aug 2017

The dispute arose from two consumer complaints filed by the respondent before the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Nagpur, alleging that ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Restores Consumer Forum Orders in Loan Insurance Dispute — Finance Company Held Liable for Delay in Obtaining Insurance Policy Despite Premium Payment. The Court held that under Section 64VB(2) of the Insurance Act, 1938, risk is covered from the date of premium payment, and the finance company's delay in obtaining the policy from its sister concern constituted deficiency of service.

16 Apr 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the complainant, Ashatai w/o Anand Duparte, against the order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressa...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Developer's Appeals in Consumer Disputes Over Delayed Possession — Compensation Modified to 9% Interest Per Annum in Line with Consent Orders. The Court held that the developer is entitled to a three-year completion period and compensation for delay shall be at a uniform rate of 9% per annum, not the higher rates awarded by the NCDRC.

10 May 2019

The Supreme Court disposed of a batch of civil appeals arising from orders of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) concerning d...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)