Search Results for "disputed entitlement"

786 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 786 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Consent Decree Execution Dispute — Family Settlement Must Be Enforced to Give Fruits of Decree. Court Holds That Executing Court Cannot Nullify Consent Terms by Reading Implied Conditions; Direction Issued to Execute Letter of Allotment.

The dispute arose between two groups of family members, the PA Group (appellants) and the RA Group (respondents), over the assets of Kash Foods Privat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Benefits to Retired Bank Employee Despite Delay in Deposit of Contribution Amount Under Joint Note Dated 27 April 2010. The court held that the three-day period for deposit was unreasonable and that the petitioner's substantial compliance warranted granting pension.

The petitioner, Ramesh Gajanan Nigudkar, joined the Bank of Baroda as a subordinate staff member on 4 March 1967 and retired after 39 years of unblemi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Recovery Certificate in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Compromise Terms Binding on Liquidator. Recovery Certificate for Rs.4,44,216/- upheld as compromise was validly entered into and not challenged.

The Petitioner, Adarsh Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd. and its Liquidator, challenged an order dated 16 October 1998 passed by the Industrial Court, Mumbai,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Husband to Lead Evidence First in Property Dispute with Wife — Order 18 Rules 1 and 2 CPC Interpreted. Husband Must Prove His Case as He Would Be Defeated if No Evidence Is Given, Given His Admission of Wife's Payment.

The case involves a property dispute between husband and wife. The wife filed a petition seeking a declaration that she is the sole owner of one of tw...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Amendment of Probate Schedule by Prothonotary. Prothonotary has power to allow amendment of schedule of assets in probate proceedings under Section 317 of Indian Succession Act, 1925.

The petitioners, Mukesh Ramanlal Gokal and Bharat Ramanlal Gokal, filed a petition under the Testamentary and Intestate Jurisdiction of the Bombay Hig...