Search Results for "direct recruitment"

94 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 94 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal Against High Court's Direction to Retrospectively Appoint Compassionate Appointee to Higher Post. Candidate Who Accepted Lower Post with Undertaking Is Estopped from Claiming Retrospective Appointment to Higher Post.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the State of Tamil Nadu against the judgment of the Division Bench of the Madras High Court (Madurai Be...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Seniority Dispute, Quashing High Court Division Bench Judgment. Seniority lists prepared based on date of dispatch of select lists were held arbitrary and contrary to Rule 5 of Uttar Pradesh Government Servants Seniority Rules, 1991, requiring fresh merit-based list.

The dispute arose from seniority lists dated 05.09.2006 and 05.03.2010 for Junior Engineers in the Department of Minor Irrigation, Uttar Pradesh, invo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Employer's Appeal in Pay Scale Dispute Under Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948. The Court held that office orders introducing a stagnation scheme did not require gazette notification under Section 79, as the Board had authority under existing regulations to fix pay scales.

The appeal arose from a dispute over pay scales for Junior Engineers (Civil) employed by the Punjab State Electricity Board (PSEB). To address stagnat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Appellant in Service Law Seniority Dispute Based on Select Panel Merit. Seniority of Direct Recruits Determined by Order of Merit in Select Panel Under DoPT OM Dated 3 July 1986, Not Date of Joining, as 1971 Rules Were Silent on Inter-Se Seniority for Combined All India List.

The dispute arose from the Military Engineering Service, where candidates were selected in 1983 for Superintendent posts across five Commands but some...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Service Promotion Dispute Under Uttar Pradesh Transport Rules. Promotion Claim Rejected as Rules Mandate Competitive Examination for Assistant Public Prosecutor Appointment Under Rule 5 of Uttar Pradesh Transport (Subordinate) Prosecution Service Rules, 1979.

The dispute originated from the respondent's service as a Cashier in the Transport Department since June 1967. Following alleged misconduct, a departm...